High-competence low-warmth groups are reliably rated low on warmth.

Evidence

Thus, the warmth dimension did consistently distinguish among groups. Across studies, 76.4% of the warmth comparisons were significant. More specifically, a critic might argue that the high competence, low warmth group was not consistently low on warmth. However, it was significantly lower than the high warmth groups in nine of nine tests and equivalent to the other low warmth cluster four of eight times. Thus, the warmth dimension remains important, although it admittedly distinguished less than the competence dimension did. Because competence varied more than warmth, the warmth differences suffer by comparison. Nevertheless, the warmth effects are sizable, significant, and reliable. — Susan T. Fiske et al., A Model of (Often Mixed) Stereotype…, 295

Categorization

• XREF: connects to: High-competence groups are judged significantly lower in warmth, yielding mixed stereotypes. — Susan T. Fiske et al., A Model of (Often Mixed) Stereotype…, 120; Groups seen as competing with the ingroup are stereotyped as low in warmth — , Rudman, Laurie A - On the Nature of…, 1491; High-competence low-warmth outgroups share a stereotype of being too competent — Susan T. Fiske et al., A Model of (Often Mixed) Stereotype…, 30 (+4 more)

Broader Connections

• Mixed stereotypes combine high competence with low warmth or vice versa #exemplifies (0.90) — Susan T. Fiske et al., A Model of (Often Mixed) Stereotype…, 3
• High-competence low-warmth outgroups share a stereotype of being too competent #exemplifies (0.88) — Susan T. Fiske et al., A Model of (Often Mixed) Stereotype…, 30
• Envied out-groups draw low-warmth stereotypes that rationalize their exclusion #expands (0.82) — Susan T. Fiske et al., A Model of (Often Mixed) Stereotype…, 32
• Enviable outgroups historically split from pitied ones along warmth and competence. #expands (0.82) — Susan T. Fiske et al., A Model of (Often Mixed) Stereotype…, 19
• Groups seen as competing with the ingroup are stereotyped as low in warmth #expands (0.78) — , Rudman, Laurie A - On the Nature of…, 1491
• People judge compared groups as opposites on warmth and competence. #qualifies (0.72) — Susan T. Fiske, Stereotype Content, 46