Misplaced trust costs far more than forgone trust, making distrust come more quickly

Evidence

In a relatively benign society, we can afford to take chances with people in general until we discover any of them not to be worthy of cooperation. If, in contrast, we had come to be distrusting in general, the result in a benign society would surely be far worse than what would follow from taking risks on people. Presumably, it would seem much more akin to much of international relations, as in the Cold War between East and West, in which distrust often seemed to be the baseline and trust to be an unreachable goal. Still, to be generally distrusting—or at least to fail to trust—would not be irrational or immoral in some contexts. — Russell Hardin, Trust and Trustworthiness, 605 (#corroborates, via linked claim)

Categorization

  • XREF: connects to: Generalized distrust in a benign society costs more than misplaced risks — Russell Hardin, Trust and Trustworthiness, 605; Distrust requires little evidence while trust demands rich understanding of incentives; Distrust is self-reinforcing because it starves itself of corrective information

Broader Connections