Households adopted active financial management under either necessity, opportunity, or both.

Evidence

In this section, we turn to analysing attitudinal and behavioural indicators of more active or savvy financial management. Our null hypothesis, Hypothesis 3a, is that no one had to change their attitudes to increase their involvement with financial products as the industry pushed to sell everyone as much as they could. Our other versions of Hypothesis 3 explore the idea that some SES groups were more likely than others to change how they thought about active financial management either because of necessity, opportunity or a mix of both. — Neil Fligstein & Adam Goldstein, The Emergence of a Finance Culture in…, 105

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Frames the analytical distinction between financialization driven by industry push (no attitude change needed) versus SES-driven pulls of necessity, opportunity, or both.
  • XREF: connects to: Households are pushed into financial markets that promise lifestyle advancement. — Neil Fligstein & Adam Goldstein, The Emergence of a Finance Culture in…, 34; Financialization forced households to adopt a proactive finance culture beyond just consuming more debt. — Neil Fligstein & Adam Goldstein, The Emergence of a Finance Culture in…, 46; Financialization also operates as a cultural shift toward entrepreneurial self-management of household finances. — Neil Fligstein & Adam Goldstein, The Emergence of a Finance Culture in…, 19 (+1 more)

Broader Connections