Finance culture is a cultural frame, not an exogenous shift imposed on households.

Evidence

The idea that a finance culture has taken hold in the top part of the SES distribution needs to be explored more fully. We have been careful to avoid implying that finance culture represents some kind of exogenous cultural shift that has independently come to affect our identities. Instead, we have conceived of it as a cultural frame that makes some people look at what they own as assets and offer an appropriate set of tactics to manage our risk, debt and equity. — Neil Fligstein & Adam Goldstein, The Emergence of a Finance Culture in…, 151

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Clarifies the key concept: finance culture as a cultural frame that reframes household possessions as assets requiring risk/debt/equity management.
  • ADDENDUM: Connects to the financialization of everyday household life theme which underpins the reader’s reading purpose.
  • XREF: Echoes the Bourdieu-style framing of culture as a structuring frame; connects to broader financialization literature like Kus 2013 mentioned in the next paragraph. — connects to: Culture is not superstructural but is where financialized capitalism subjugates social values — Max Haiven, Cultures of Financialization, 563; Culture is a process of creating and transforming reality, not an environment. — James W. Carey, Communication as Culture- Essays on…, 323; Financialization is reproduced from everyday life, not imposed by an autonomous elite — Max Haiven, Cultures of Financialization, 129 (+1 more)

Broader Connections