Courts racialized Muslim identity using skin color and the one-drop rule.

Evidence

A 1913 case involving an immigrant petitioner from modern-day Lebanon, Ex parte Shahid, illustrates how Muslim identity was acutely racialized and deeply institutionalized during this time. Following George Shishim’s lead, Faras Shahid, a Maronite Christian, asserted his Christian faith to rebut the presumption that he was a Muslim. Judge Henry Smith engaged in his own brand of in-court eugenics, describing Shahid to be “about [the color] of a walnut, or somewhat darker than is the usual mulatto of one-half mixed blood between the white and the negro races.” — Khaled A. Beydoun, American Islamophobia_ Understanding…, 186

Categorization

  • QUESTION: The explicit link to Plessy and the one-drop rule merits deeper reading on how race law framework was transplanted onto religion.
  • XREF: Direct tie to Rana’s apparatus reading and Ernst’s psychology — racist legal logic applied to religious identity. — connects to: Courts constructed whiteness on shifting criteria including religion. — Khaled A. Beydoun, American Islamophobia_ Understanding…, 183; Muslim names alone can racialize phenotypically white people — , Selod, Saher - Forever Suspect_…, 91; Lighter skin and Westernized names let some Muslims pass as white (+6 more)
  • corroborated: 2 independent passages support this claim — Khaled A. Beydoun, American Islamophobia_ Understanding…, 186

Broader Connections