Whiteness rulings on Muslim immigrants varied absurdly by court rather than by consistent principle.

Evidence

Syrians, Turks, and other light-skinned Muslims were successful in gaining citizenship, establishing themselves in ethnic enclaves in New York, Michigan, and other metropolitan areas even while others were not successful. One of the hallmarks of the immigration cases during this period are the inconsistent holdings from different courts regarding the whiteness of petitioners, the consequence of which was the absurdity that people who were essentially from the same ethnic background could be white in one court and not in another. — Cyra Akila Choudhury, Racecraft and Identity in the Emergence…, 172

Categorization

  • XREF: Directly maps onto the reader’s existing knowledge of Aziz’s Racial Muslim argument about how courts inconsistently racialized Muslims through citizenship law. — connects to: Conflicting court rulings proved whiteness was legally incoherent and socially constructed — Sahar F. Aziz, The Racial Muslim: When Racism Quashes…, 535; Courts constructed whiteness on shifting criteria including religion. — Khaled A. Beydoun, American Islamophobia_ Understanding…, 183; Courts disagreed across jurisdictions about whether Arabs were white (+9 more)

Broader Connections