Communities organize around common resources motivated by virtues and cooperation.

Evidence

Returning to commons organizing, in this article we study the development of novel forms of organizing driven by communities of people that work in common for the common good and common resources. The motivations for these communities include human virtues and human cooperation due to prosocial attitudes towards others (Batson 2011). — Laura Albareda and Alejo Jose G. Sison, Commons Organizing, 201

Categorization

• corroborated: 5 independent passages support this claim — Laura Albareda and Alejo Jose G. Sison, Commons Organizing: Embedding Common…, 201
• XREF: connects to: Commons function as social resources binding communities together, not just property rights. — Emil Sandström and Ann-Kristin Ekman and Karl-Johan Lindholm, Commoning in the periphery – The role…, 10; Community associations can reclaim closed public buildings as shared meeting places through negotiation. — Emil Sandström and Ann-Kristin Ekman and Karl-Johan Lindholm, Commoning in the periphery – The role…, 50; Traditional community bonds bring corruption and intolerance as well as civic benefit. — Robert Putnam, Bowling Alone: America’s Declining…, 77 (+12 more)

Related

• Commons organizing fuses ethical common-good production with peer sharing. (similarity 0.87)
• Converging virtue and commons theories yields both complementarities and organizing tensions. (similarity 0.84)
• Commons organizing names the process by which communities jointly produce and govern common goods. (similarity 0.84)
• Institutions for collective action emerge from community incentives, reciprocity, and trust that curb free-riding. (similarity 0.83)
• Communities can act collectively as a single entrepreneur and enterprise. (similarity 0.83)
• Prosocial organizing spans CSR, social enterprises, hybrids, and community ventures. (similarity 0.81)
• Commoning joins producing shared goods with cultivating collective skills and character. (similarity 0.81)
• Commons function as social resources binding communities together, not just property rights. (similarity 0.81)
• Cooperatives reproduce themselves through shared governance and yield both material and immaterial common resources. (similarity 0.80)
• Digital voluntary communities can produce collective goods unmet by states and markets. (similarity 0.79)

Broader Connections

• Cooperatives reproduce themselves through shared governance and yield both material and immaterial common resources. #exemplifies (0.90) — Jessica Carrick-Hagenbarth, Institutional Bricolage and Commoning…, 14
• Social capital divides into bonding and bridging forms that aid cooperation. #expands (0.85) — Robert D. Putnam, Bowling Alone The Collapse and Revival…, 48
• Cooperation rests on coercion, interests, values, and personal bonds #corroborates (0.80) — Diego Gambetta, Trust - Making and Breaking Cooperative…, 2202
• Cooperative behavior is partly motivated by reputation concerns. #qualifies (0.72) — Nicolas Baumard, A mutualistic approach to morality, 311