Prosocial organizing spans CSR, social enterprises, hybrids, and community ventures.

Evidence

In this paper, we also aim to understand the nature of “commons organizing” as a phenomenon within the extensive prosocial organizing research field (Peredo et al. 2018). Human prosocial behavior refers to voluntary actions motivated by the ultimate goal of increasing others’ welfare, benefiting, comforting and sharing with others (Batson 2011). … Among prosocial organizing traits, Peredo et al. (2018) mention the spread of CSR, social enterprises and hybrid organizations. Other forms include community-based enterprises or B corporations and collective environmental entrepreneurship. — Laura Albareda and Alejo Jose G. Sison, Commons Organizing, 199

Categorization

• DEFINE: Defines prosocial behavior and scopes prosocial organizing as a research field with its roster of organizational forms.
• corroborated: 5 independent passages support this claim — Laura Albareda and Alejo Jose G. Sison, Commons Organizing: Embedding Common…, 199
• XREF: connects to: Commons organizing differs from social enterprises by prioritizing communal flourishing over financial sustainability. — Laura Albareda and Alejo Jose G. Sison, Commons Organizing: Embedding Common…, 203; Hybrid organizations embed social purpose and financial sustainability in a dual logic. — Laura Albareda and Alejo Jose G. Sison, Commons Organizing: Embedding Common…, 200; Cooperative ventures are exchanges proportional to each partner’s contribution. — Nicolas Baumard, A mutualistic approach to morality: The…, 92 (+4 more)

Related

• Commons organizing differs from social enterprises by prioritizing communal flourishing over financial sustainability. (similarity 0.88)
• Communities can act collectively as a single entrepreneur and enterprise. (similarity 0.85)
• Commons organizing fuses ethical common-good production with peer sharing. (similarity 0.84)
• Commons initiatives emerge as entrepreneurial community movements responding to member marginalization. (similarity 0.82)
• Communities organize around common resources motivated by virtues and cooperation. (similarity 0.81)
• Hybrid organizations embed social purpose and financial sustainability in a dual logic. (similarity 0.81)
• Laura Albareda and Alejo Jose G. Sison — Commons Organizing Embedding Common Good and Institutions for Collective Action. Insights from Ethics and Economics (similarity 0.79)
• Commons organizing names the process by which communities jointly produce and govern common goods. (similarity 0.79)

Broader Connections

• Hybrid organizations embed social purpose and financial sustainability in a dual logic. #exemplifies (0.80) — Laura Albareda and Alejo Jose G. Sison, Commons Organizing, 200
• Commons organizing fuses ethical common-good production with peer sharing. #expands (0.80) — Laura Albareda and Alejo Jose G. Sison, Commons Organizing, 151
• Commons organizing names the process by which communities jointly produce and govern common goods. #expands (0.78) — Laura Albareda and Alejo Jose G. Sison, Commons Organizing, 17
• Commons organizing generates tensions with markets, regulations, and economic sustainability. #expands (0.78) — Laura Albareda and Alejo Jose G. Sison, Commons Organizing, 193
• Commons organizing differs from social enterprises by prioritizing communal flourishing over financial sustainability. #expands (0.75) — Laura Albareda and Alejo Jose G. Sison, Commons Organizing, 203
• Cooperative ventures are exchanges proportional to each partner’s contribution. #exemplifies (0.75) — Nicolas Baumard, A mutualistic approach to morality, 92
• Communities can act collectively as a single entrepreneur and enterprise. #exemplifies (0.75) — Laura Albareda and Alejo Jose G. Sison, Commons Organizing, 71