Colonial sentiment discipline targeted colonizers themselves, not only the colonized
Related
- Historians should read along the colonial grain before reading against it (similarity 0.87)
- Colonial rulers sincerely believed their own religious and self-interested ideology (similarity 0.85)
- Colonial state vocabularies were built on sentiments, not just reason (similarity 0.85)
- Colonial administrators promoted racial division to secure white loyalty and preserve slavery (similarity 0.85)
- Official colonial correspondence was saturated by speculative, contested street-level voices. (similarity 0.85)
- Colonial sensibilities remain poorly understood despite scholarly confidence otherwise (similarity 0.85)
- Colonial authorities understood sentiment’s governance role before scholars did (similarity 0.84)
- Colonial regimes deliberately cultivated habits and redirected sentiments, a neglected topic. (similarity 0.83)
- Colonial dispositions are trained, contested, and deliberately interpreted (similarity 0.83)
- Colonial officials distrusted the black police force and armed white militias instead (similarity 0.83)
- Colonial archives were sites of expectation and conjured futures, not mere records. (similarity 0.83)
- Colonial archives preserve fantasies of what might yet be, not just events. (similarity 0.83)
- Interpersonal colonial hostility mirrors opposing stances on European pretension (similarity 0.83)
- Colonial studies centers reason and Enlightenment principles as foundations of rule. (similarity 0.83)
- Colonial rescue narratives portray the non-Western world as needing the West. (similarity 0.83)