Colonial states engineered morality by harnessing affect in their agents.

Evidence

In the colonies, Weber’s reasoned state, staffed by ā€œcultivated men,ā€ complemented Durkheim’s moralizing one. Colonial states were in the business of ā€œengineering morality,ā€ both among their agents and those ruled. As such, both Weber and Durkheim attended to a register of governance neither explicitly named: the harnessing of affect in the state’s shaping of what constituted morality and who had the right to assess it. — Ann Laura Stoler, Along the Archival Grain_ Epistemic…, 426

Categorization

  • QUESTION: Which colonial archival sources directly evidence this ā€˜engineering of morality’ as a deliberate state project versus a retrospective scholarly frame?
  • corroborated: 3 independent passages support this claim — Ann Laura Stoler, Along the Archival Grain_ Epistemic…, 426
  • XREF: connects to: Colonial reformers’ ethical indignation coexisted with colonial privilege; Colonial moral epithets encoded specific class and racial transgressions; Colonial dispositions are trained, contested, and deliberately interpreted (+19 more)

Broader Connections