Colonial rule of India by its own laws required European mastery of Sanskrit.
Related
- Colonial rulers sincerely believed their own religious and self-interested ideology (similarity 0.82)
- Historians should read along the colonial grain before reading against it (similarity 0.81)
- Colonial sentiment discipline targeted colonizers themselves, not only the colonized (similarity 0.80)
- Colonial archives preserve fantasies of what might yet be, not just events. (similarity 0.80)
- Colonial archives were sites of expectation and conjured futures, not mere records. (similarity 0.80)
- Colonial studies centers reason and Enlightenment principles as foundations of rule. (similarity 0.80)
- Only a materialist-comparatist frame can break the colonial grip on Indian English Studies. (similarity 0.79)
- Indo activists explicitly renounced colonial stereotypes of docility (similarity 0.79)
- Educated Muslim Africans fit neither colonial legal category, exposing the republic’s contradiction. (similarity 0.79)
- Colonial archives functioned as active technologies of rule, not passive records (similarity 0.79)
- France’s mission was to wrest colonial control from Louverture and Rigaud (similarity 0.79)
- A 1941 tract framed caste tyranny as a form of Hindu imperialism. (similarity 0.78)
- Colonial India’s dominant intelligentsia adopted a stratified three-track language division (similarity 0.78)
- Colonial administration simply could not operate in its own imperial languages (similarity 0.78)
- Colonial subjects’ migration to Britain answered prior imperial presence (similarity 0.78)