Interpersonal colonial hostility mirrors opposing stances on European pretension
Related
- Official colonial correspondence was saturated by speculative, contested street-level voices. (similarity 0.83)
- Colonial sentiment discipline targeted colonizers themselves, not only the colonized (similarity 0.83)
- Historians should read along the colonial grain before reading against it (similarity 0.82)
- Colonial sensibilities remain poorly understood despite scholarly confidence otherwise (similarity 0.82)
- Focusing on culture displaces material colonial history while producing racialized figures. (similarity 0.81)
- Competing colonial plans encode rival readings of past, present, and future (similarity 0.80)
- Advanced cultures only offered racism and imperialism for dealing with other cultures (similarity 0.80)
- Racism and hostility intensify rather than erase traditional identifications. (similarity 0.80)
- Colonial rulers sincerely believed their own religious and self-interested ideology (similarity 0.80)
- Colonial rule bound Indo loyalty to hierarchical complicity against natives (similarity 0.80)
- Egypt’s nationalism embodies a colonized-colonizer paradox the binary model misses (similarity 0.80)
- France could not maintain free and slave colonies within sight of each other (similarity 0.79)
- Colonial representations of natives contained their opposite readings from first contact. (similarity 0.79)
- Islamic Orientalists turned alienation into superiority rather than self-understanding (similarity 0.79)
- Even anticolonial Egyptian nationalists reproduced demeaning stereotypes of Sudanese slaves. (similarity 0.79)