Colonialism operates through objective role, not personal intention

Evidence

And do not seek to know whether personally these gentlemen are in good or bad faith, whether personally they have good or bad intentions. Whether personally - that is, in the private conscience of Peter or Paul - they are or are not colonialists, because the essential thing is that their highly problematical subjective good faith is entirely irrelevant to the objective social implications of the evil work they perform as watchdogs of colonialism. — Aimé Césaire, Discourse on Colonialism, 125

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Defines the structuralist move: condemning the social function of a role (watchdog of colonialism) rather than the private conscience of the individual occupying it.
  • XREF: Anticipates later theories of structural/systemic racism and Foucauldian analysis of discourse and institutions where individual intent is subordinated to systemic function. — connects to: Traveler-scientists’ impersonality masked their service to colonial ambition; Objective enemies are defined by state policy, not by their own actions — Hannah Arendt, The Origins of Totalitarianism, 950; Colonialism occupies the individual’s psyche, not merely the territory — Frantz Fanon, A Dying Colonialism, 222 (+7 more)

Broader Connections