British anti-racism discourse centred on colour until the early 1990s

Evidence

The Runnymede Trust was founded in 1968. Up until about 1992 the dominant terms in Runnymede’s discourse were ‘race’, ‘race relations’ and ‘colour’ – the Trust’s work reflected, that is to say, the conceptual consensus established by the Race Relations Acts of the 1960s and 1976. The dominant discourse portrayed everyone as either white or coloured – or, according to the terminology developed in the eighties, white or black (later, since about 1998, white or BME – Black and minority ethnic). The worldview reflected in this language was derived in part from the United States and in part from Britain’s experience as a colonial power. — A. Hussain, N. Meer, Framing Muslim Integration, 730

Categorization

  • XREF: Explains the U.S.- and colonial-derived ‘white vs. black’ framing that set up the context in which Islamophobia as a distinct racism form had to be asserted. — connects to: British anti-racist unity under black identity dissolved as politics of recognition grew; Britishness carries largely unspoken racial connotations and is usually imagined as white; The anti-racist term ‘black’ excluded Asians and prompted new identities — Chris Allen, Islamophobia, 57 (+2 more)