Muslims were told anti-Muslim racism cannot exist because Muslims are not a race

Evidence

Western European Muslims have found these scholarly hegemonies an especially galling obstacle to getting academia and fellow citizens to understand the exclusionary discourses and misrecognitions that Muslims are subject to. Following the assertive Muslim agency triggered off by the Satanic Verses affair and other Muslim controversies, as Muslims responded to such hostilities and articulated their misrecognition, they were constantly told, especially in Britain, that there is no such thing as anti-Muslim racism because Muslims are a religious group and not a race. Hence Muslims could legitimately ask for toleration and religious pluralism but not for inclusion in anti-racist egalitarian analyses and initiatives. — Runnymede Trust (ed. Farah Elahi & Omar Khan), Islamophobia, 583

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Gives the historical-political origin of the central definitional dispute this reader is tracking — why ‘racism’ was initially denied to Muslims as a religious group, directly framing the anti-Muslim-racism turn.
  • XREF: This is the load-bearing origin story for the entire definitional debate the reader is mapping — the religious-group-not-race objection is precisely what Runnymede 2017 and the UN racism definition were built to overturn, against which Halliday’s ‘anti-Muslimism’ partially conceded. — connects to: Anti-Muslim bias is denied legitimacy by framing Muslimness as voluntarily chosen. — Nasar Meer, Tariq Modood, Refutations of Racism in the ‘Muslim…, 8; Anti-Muslim discrimination should be fought through existing anti-racism frameworks — A. Hussain, N. Meer, Framing Muslim Integration, 58; New racist rhetoric lets far-right groups deny racism while demarcating Muslims — Chris Allen, Islamophobia, 464 (+13 more)

Broader Connections