Alliance cohesion theories predict NATO should have dissolved after the Soviet threat vanished

Evidence

These cautious public statements, however, did not match NATO’s internal threat assessments, which as early as 1988 had begun to question the ability of the Soviet Union to move its troops quickly through Eastern Europe and make effective use of still-numerous Warsaw Pact troops. … Both balance-of-threat and balance-ofpower theories on alliances predict the loss of cohesion in an alliance as, first, the threat posed by and, then, the capability of its adversaries diminish. — Robert B. McCalla, NATO’s persistence after the cold war, 40

Categorization

  • XREF: The reader is investigating why NATO persisted when its founding enemy died; this passage supplies the baseline theoretical expectation (cohesion should fall) that persistence would contradict. — connects to: Analysts expected NATO to die once its Soviet enemy vanished. — Robert B. McCalla, NATO’s persistence after the cold war, 12; NATO has expanded rather than dissolved after the Soviet threat ended. — Robert B. McCalla, NATO’s persistence after the cold war, 15; NATO reoriented itself after the Cold War and stayed valuable without a compelling threat — Robert B. McCalla, NATO’s persistence after the cold war, 29 (+10 more)

Broader Connections