Lee McIntyre — Post-Truth
197 published claims from this book.
- 60 Minutes proved news could profit, ending the loss-leader era.
- 60 Minutes was the first profitable TV news show in history
- A doubt campaign reached 43 million Americans on a settled question.
- A founder of social constructivism publicly regretted that his ideas aided right-wing climate denial
- A larger fear-processing amygdala may make conservatives more susceptible to threats
- A newspaper circulation war helped spark the Spanish-American War
- A single alt-right blogger promoted multiple viral conspiracy theories during 2016.
- A single fabricated news story fabricated at a kitchen table reached six million readers
- ABC launched Nightline mainly as a cheap marketing counter to Johnny Carson.
- Accusing science of bias is a stepping-stone to admitting ideologically tainted alternatives
- Algorithmic feeds convert the open Internet into personalized echo chambers
- American newspaper circulation dropped almost seventy percent between 1950 and 2010
- An unexplained 1898 explosion was blamed on Spain by the yellow press
- Anti-factual tactics normatively rebound hardest onto the vulnerable they were meant to protect
- Anti-government ideology independently motivated climate-change denial beyond industry funding
- Audience laziness and entitlement, not just technology, enable modern fake news
- Authoritarian propaganda exploits cognitive biases while hiding the manipulation itself
- Balanced-reporting norms let fringe deniers distort coverage of settled science
- Believing all media are biased pushes partisans toward their own echo chambers.
- Believing all media are biased pushes people toward sources biased in their favor.
- Brexit and Trump’s election resulted from rather than caused post-truth
- Cable news networks profited enormously by giving Trump free media coverage
- Calling something post-truth is inherently a normative judgment
- Climate-change denial organizations were directly funded by tobacco and fossil-fuel interests
- Cognitive bias plus curated information feeds industrial post-truth vulnerability
- Cognitive biases alone cannot explain post-truth without later media factors
- Cognitive biases are an inherited feature of all human brains, not curable
- Cognitive biases are hardwired parts of human brains rather than avoidable mistakes.
- Cognitive biases toward group acceptance are the precursor for post-truth
- Cognitive dissonance resolves primarily to protect self-worth, not truth
- Colbert’s joke term ‘truthiness’ now describes mainstream political reality
- Conservatives believe threatening falsehoods more readily than liberals do
- Conspiracy bloggers explicitly cite postmodern relativism to justify distrusting mainstream news.
- Conspiracy promoters adopt postmodern relativism to license fabricating news.
- Corporate science denial was born when tobacco firms funded fake research.
- Correcting false beliefs can strengthen them rather than reduce them
- Deliberate misinformation weaponized for profit or power can outcompete true news
- Desires and emotional comfort shape what people believe is true
- Digital media isolate people from contrary opinion which face-to-face life once forced
- Disconfirmed prophecies get reinterpreted rather than abandoned when believers are invested
- Drama-driven media coverage of bogus claims breeds lasting public harm
- Echo chambers convert the social-corrective group effect into conformity pressure
- Emotional reactions signal confirmation bias, not evidence against a story.
- Equal-time objectivity norms create false equivalence on settled factual issues
- Erosion of truth-telling is a warning sign preceding authoritarian politics
- Even disconfirmation evidence often fails to break a person’s confirmation bias
- Even fully exposed disinformation strategies succeed because facts cannot override trained media habits
- Even the most partisan reasoners eventually change beliefs under repeated corrective evidence
- Exposure to local climate impacts can convert a Republican mayor to climate activism
- ExxonMobil planned Arctic drilling to exploit the very melting its funded skeptics denied
- Face-to-face interaction historically countered cognitive bias by forcing diverse viewpoints
- Fact-challenging arises from motive to protect beliefs and enables political domination
- Fake news has nearly triggered inter-state nuclear conflict
- Fake news is better countered by flooding with real news than censorship.
- Fake news is deliberately false and evolved from clickbait to political manipulation
- Fake news softens trust in sources before status-based propaganda replaces persuasion
- Fake news technology is a neutral tool whose harm depends on human response.
- Fake news transitions from a profit motive to political weaponization
- False equivalence between sides is itself a hallmark of post-truth
- False equivalence can disguise bias under a show of balance
- Falsifiable claims coexisted with advisers rejecting evidential standards outright
- Fear of Fox comparison pushed mainstream media toward false balance
- Fifth-graders can learn to detect fake news through practice games.
- Fighting post-truth requires doubting one’s own favored beliefs first
- Filtering fake news invites charges of censorship bias.
- Flooding discourse with dishonesty can displace censorship as a control tool
- Fossil fuel funding manufactured doubt that made climate change a partisan media issue
- Fox News succeeded because market demand for partisan news already existed
- Fox viewers were measurably less well informed than people watching no news.
- Free-market advocates rejected market-based carbon pricing for political reasons.
- Freedom from monarchical reality-control is recent and requires active citizen participation
- Group affiliation alone can override moral condemnation of cheating.
- Hearst fabricated visual atrocity propaganda to provoke a war
- Ideologues pair extreme doubt toward disfavored facts with total credulity toward favored ones
- Ignoring a false attack let it define the message
- Intelligent Design creationism fuses Christian fundamentalism with postmodernism
- Intelligent Design theory deliberately borrowed postmodernist tactics from evolution’s opponents
- Intelligent Design theory furnished the blueprint later used by climate deniers
- Intelligent Design’s founder reframed the evolution fight to avoid a science-versus-Bible framing
- Intelligent Design’s godfather openly declared himself a postmodernist deconstructionist
- Intent to deceive can be inferred from persistence despite the falsity being revealed
- Journalistic objectivity means facilitating truth, not equal time to falsehood
- Journalists lack the expertise and time to verify scientific claims
- Kahneman and Tversky’s cognitive psychology reshaped mainstream economics
- Liberals resisted corrections but showed no backfire effect, unlike conservatives
- Limbaugh pioneered positioning himself as truth against mainstream media.
- Limbaugh’s call screening aimed at community feeling, not debate.
- Limbaugh’s call-in format built community through screened agreement, not debate.
- Major news outlets abandoned false-equivalence coverage of climate change
- Manufactured ‘both sides’ coverage made the public believe science was genuinely divided
- Manufactured doubt is the replicable engine of science denial.
- Manufactured doubt, not genuine debate, explains public confusion over climate science consensus
- Manufactured scientific doubt was the proving ground for today’s wholesale rejection of truth.
- Media profit incentives over truth drove audiences toward social media
- Modern academic postmodernism grew from 1980s literary deconstruction
- Motivated reasoning engages different brain circuitry than neutral reasoning.
- Motivated reasoning is the motive while confirmation bias is the mechanism
- Network news divisions existed largely as loss leaders to satisfy broadcast licensing law
- News aggregators strip away the visual and contextual cues that once signaled reliability
- News fragmentation across alternative media enabled Trump’s election success.
- News outlets demanded false balance on climate because backers and advertisers bought it
- News silos cannot protect audiences from post-truth because both exploit the same biases
- Newspaper circulation, revenue, and staff collapsed sharply since 2014
- Newspaper objectivity can be compromised by editorial sympathy for powerful figures
- Observers fear current politics is re-enacting 1984’s truth-as-casualty dynamics
- One small Macedonian town hosted over a hundred pro-Trump fake news websites
- Openly subordinating facts to feelings is a new strategy for political dominance
- Over a third of people deny clear sensory evidence to conform with a group.
- Partisan cable news abandoned objectivity to confirm viewer biases at the public’s expense
- Partisan misinformation flourished during both the French and American revolutions
- Partisans trust news sources sorted by ideology, with liberals trusting even comedy outlets
- People can choose how to react to attempts to manipulate truth
- People discount their own sense evidence to conform to group consensus
- People excuse immorality from in-group members arbitrarily defined
- People paid less to lie rationalize the lie as genuine belief
- People preferentially seek confirming evidence and avoid testing their own hypotheses.
- Physical reality eventually punishes those who deny it
- Physical reality overrides spin, as Feynman’s O-ring test showed
- Political impact of fake news is independent of its creators’ actual motives
- Politicians can disregard evidence openly when partisanship outweighs facts for their voters.
- Post-truth is a choice of response to reality, not a fixed condition
- Post-truth predates 2016 with roots in cognitive bias, philosophy, and media change
- Post-truth roots lie in ancient cognitive bias, academic relativism, and media change
- Post-truth spans a spectrum from bullshit and spin to self-deception and delusion
- Post-truth spans distinct attitudes from bullshitting to delusive self-deception.
- Post-truth tactics first matured in right-wing science denial campaigns
- Post-truth’s novelty is denying reality’s existence, not lying or spin.
- Postmodern interpretive relativism, once applied to politics, licenses alternative facts
- Postmodernism holds that truth claims are really bids for political power
- Postmodernism overreached when it turned from literary texts to natural science
- Postmodernism’s popularity stems partly from its definitional obscurity
- Postmodernist premises applied to politics yield post-truth reality denial
- Postmodernists enabled misuse of their ideas by retreating into subtlety
- Pro-Trump fake news earned vastly more ad revenue than pro-Clinton content
- Proper scientific method requires acknowledging gaps and provisional positions rather than hiding them.
- Public climate inaction takes four distinct psychological evasion forms
- Questioning science may have been borrowed from postmodernism by right-wing ideologues.
- Refusing to answer lies allows them to spread unchallenged among the undecided
- Refuting a lie aims at its audience, not the liar
- Regulatory license threat made news divisions unprofitable loss leaders that shielded network profits.
- Repeated truths eventually overcome even motivated reasoners’ resistance
- Reporting routines themselves, not political views, produced pro-climate-denial coverage.
- Revisionist-believing subjects demanded the full text believing it supported their view
- Right-wing attacks make critical self-examination nearly impossible for academic radicals
- Right-wing denialists weaponized academic leftist skepticism of experts
- Satire aims to ridicule absurdity rather than to deceive viewers
- Science denial pioneered tactics now applied across all factual reality
- Science denial trained today’s politicians to deny any inconvenient facts.
- Science deniers do not reject science itself, only its inconvenient conclusions
- Science deniers exploit science’s unfalsifiability-of-proof to demand equal standing for pseudoscience.
- Science studies arguments were co-opted by science deniers
- Science’s self-correcting attitude is a model for resisting post-truth.
- Seeding doubt about settled science effectively confuses the public
- Self-affirmation weakly aids acceptance of corrective facts, but graphics outperform narratives
- Self-deception about our own limits, not deliberate lying, drives overconfidence.
- Serial falsehood complicates the lie-truth distinction when speakers believe their claims
- Shared social reinforcement amplifies irrational rationalization of mistaken beliefs
- Social constructivist critics described science’s methods as exploitative and even sexual violence
- Social constructivists aimed to undermine science’s single privileged perspective.
- Social media let confirmation bias drive news consumption, undercutting paid mainstream outlets
- Some critics framed science’s language as exploitative toward nature.
- Some fake news outlets deliberately mimic legitimate news brands to exploit trust
- Some post-truth speech is magical thinking rather than mere lying
- Split-screen debates made settled science look genuinely controversial to viewers.
- Talk radio monetized confirmation bias by giving audiences a voice in echo chambers.
- Talk radio succeeded by giving alienated audiences a voice, not by informing them
- The 1979 Iran hostage crisis created the demand that birthed a new news format
- The 1996 Sokal hoax succeeded because Social Text lacked peer review
- The Associated Press’s shared-client model invented journalistic objectivity
- The backfire effect does not occur symmetrically across the political spectrum
- The concept of news itself dates only to the Jacksonian era
- The concept of news itself was invented in the 1830s Jacksonian era
- The correspondence view of truth dates to Aristotle but remains contested among philosophers
- The Discovery Institute has long used postmodernist arguments to attack evolution
- The goal of objectivity is to facilitate truth, not equal time.
- The least skilled performers show the largest overestimation of their own ability.
- The New York Times rose by serving a niche market of wealthy readers
- The political right moved from attacking postmodernism to weaponizing it
- The post-truth problem’s roots trace directly to academic postmodernism
- The prefix ‘post’ in post-truth means truth is eclipsed, not past
- The Sokal hoax backfired by publicizing postmodernist ideas to right-wing readers
- The term post-truth entered public discourse through 2016’s Brexit and US election
- The tobacco industry invented science denial as public-relations strategy
- The tobacco industry’s manufactured-doubt playbook became a template for all later science denial.
- The wire service model created journalism’s objectivity ideal
- Theoretical doubts about objective truth need not override practical reliance on evidence
- Tobacco companies suppressed cancer evidence for decades before paying a $200 billion settlement.
- Tobacco’s deceit paid so well that a $200 billion settlement still turned profit.
- Traditional media face contradictory demands that make competent truth-telling punishable.
- Transactional speech values truth only by whether it advances the speaker’s goals
- Trump symptomizes rather than causes post-truth
- Trump treats truth as socially confirmed approximation rather than correspondence to fact
- Trump’s advisers explicitly claimed facts no longer exist in politics
- Trump’s early presidency began with a pattern of easily verifiable false claims
- Trumpspeak treats belief and usefulness as substitutes for factual truth
- Viewers eagerly grazed on 24-hour cable news, degrading coverage quality.
- Weaponizing the term fake news lets leaders dismiss verified reporting