Postmodernism holds that truth claims are really bids for political power

Evidence

Here we arrive at the second thesis of postmodernism: that any profession of truth is nothing more than a reflection of the political ideology of the person who is making it. Michel Foucault’s idea was that our societal life is defined by language, but language itself is shot through with the relations of power and dominance. This means that at base all knowledge claims are really just an assertion of authority; they are a bullying tactic used by the powerful to force those who are weaker to accept their ideological views. Since there is no such thing as “truth,” anyone who claims to “know” something is really just trying to oppress us, not educate us. Having power allows us to control what is true, not the other way around. If there are many perspectives, then insisting that we accept any particular one is a form of fascism. — Lee McIntyre, Post-Truth, 248

Categorization

  • DEFINE: A compact statement of what the author presents as the second thesis of postmodernism (truth claims as power assertions).
  • XREF: Connects to Foucauldian power/knowledge claims encountered in earlier chapters of Along the Archival Grain and Communication as Culture. — connects to: Postmodernist premises applied to politics yield post-truth reality denial — Lee McIntyre, Post-Truth, 292; Postmodern discourse makes all cultural positions secretly political, except the overtly political; The post-truth problem’s roots trace directly to academic postmodernism — Lee McIntyre, Post-Truth, 241 (+7 more)

Broader Connections