Robert Irwin — For Lust of Knowing: The Orientalists and Their Enemies
339 published claims from this book.
- ‘Arabist’ once meant someone reading Greek only through Arabic
- A 1779 French memo proposed invading Egypt as liberators
- A doomed homosexual passion shaped a great Orientalist’s entire life
- A fabricated Christian polemic long served as Western Europe’s main source on Muhammad
- A fourteenth-century Egyptian had sounder monetary theory than modern Europeans
- A French jeweller assessed Safavid Persia as industrially ahead of Europe
- A hard-drinking novelist seeded the rhetoric of Iran’s Islamic revolution
- A marginal mad scholar nonetheless seeded the Orientalist tradition
- A pioneer of Qur’anic scholarship ended in confessed bewilderment at its subject.
- A refugee scholar translated Ibn Khaldun into English and studied hashish in Islam
- A Savilian professor bribed an Ottoman soldier to steal Ptolemy’s Almagest.
- A scholar could enter Orientalism for aesthetic obscurity rather than imperial purpose
- A scholar’s bad faith need not invalidate the accuracy of their findings.
- A scholar’s ideological agenda does not invalidate the findings of their research
- A scholarly courtesy to a French academic cost Kratchkovsky nine months in jail
- A thirteenth-century missionary praised Muslim virtue to shame Christians
- A Turkish bibliographer’s catalog shaped European Orientalism’s image of Islam
- A twelfth-century Arabic philosophical fable shaped English empiricism and Robinson Crusoe
- A Victorian Orientalist mastered Romany, mesmerism, and multiple languages without formal schooling
- Academic Orientalism and Orientalist art were separate rather than one discourse
- Academic Orientalists eclipsed gentleman amateurs in the RAS
- Accepting one’s own suffering can relieve others’ burden of sin
- Advanced textual analysis did not beat naive compilation in finding historical truth
- Aeschylus staged his victory as tragedy from the enemy’s viewpoint
- Al-i Ahmad framed Western influence as a hollowing-out infestation
- American Middle East studies depended on recruited British and European Orientalists
- American Orientalism recruited many prominent Arab-born scholars
- American Orientalism was a German-influenced latecomer to the field
- An early history of Persian religion relied on anachronistic Islamic-era sources
- An encounter with al-Hallaj’s teachings triggered Massignon’s Catholic conversion
- An influential historical model persisted for decades without direct evidence
- Ancient insider-outsider boundaries were permeable through cultural adoption
- Annemarie Schimmel mastered six Oriental languages and fused Lutheran Christianity with Sufism.
- Anquetil-Duperron used Indian knowledge to refute Montesquieu’s Oriental despotism claims
- Anti-Orientalist critics ignored the actual scholarly merits of Orientalist findings
- Anti-Orientalist polemicists made basic historical and source-language errors
- Anti-Orientalists often relied on the very German scholarship they condemned
- Applying German textual criticism to the Bible cost a Scottish professor his chair
- Aquinas held Muslims convertible by argument and opposed forced conversion
- Arab critics attacked Said for stereotyping Orientalism and misrepresenting Islam
- Arabic numerals actually originated in India, not Arabia
- Arthur Waley preferred self-taught status to an academic chair
- Aryan racial ideology originated partly in Brahman caste distinctions
- Averroes taught that reason and faith need not harmonize
- Averroes’s philosophy was more influential in Christian Europe than in the Islamic world
- Avicenna’s medical Canon was being discarded as modern medicine advanced
- Becker judged Islamic society defective against a list of European institutional achievements.
- Belief that Jews’ mass conversion must precede the end of the world drove missions
- Bernard Lewis coined the phrase ‘clash of civilizations’, which Huntington popularized
- Bernard Lewis held that the West’s triumph leaves Islam to accept Western modernity
- Bernard Lewis’s politics obscured his genuine sympathy for Arab culture
- Biblical authority made Europeans resist accepting America as new
- Biblical source-criticism techniques inevitably transferred to studying early Islam
- Biblical textual criticism drove the era’s Arabic scholarship
- Brilliant scholars can pursue elaborate pattern-seeing delusions
- Britain neglected Oriental studies while France and Germany led the field
- Britain secretly subsidized Arabic newspapers and textbooks to spread Orientalist ideas
- Britain’s ‘Other’ for self-definition was France, not the Orient
- Britain’s wartime stake in the Middle East founded its Oriental studies school
- British Arabic teaching before 1960 ignored spoken language entirely
- British classics dominance crowded out Oriental studies at universities
- British commercial empire in China did not spur Chinese academic study
- British imperial power over Muslims did not translate into oriental scholarship
- British scholars could devote careers to Islam while despising it
- British tradition romanticized Muslim Saracens and vilified Crusaders
- Cabinets of curiosity were institutional precursors of serious Orientalism
- Christians under early Islamic rule faced real but strictly limited tolerance
- Classical Greco-Roman education shaped British imperial governance
- Classical study shifted from imitating style to analyzing content and philosophy
- Coffee was long suspected in England because it was tainted with Islam
- Colonial officials took up Oriental studies out of boredom
- Columbus sailed to outflank Islam, not merely to explore
- Commercial treaties called Capitulations structured European trade with the Ottomans
- Comparative biblical philology was accused of breeding Islam, popery, and atheism
- Danish instructions told scholars to hide any contempt for Islam
- Dante mistook Muhammad for a lapsed Christian rather than a foreign figure
- De Maistre saw the French Revolution as a purifying blood sacrifice
- De Sacy projected his Jacobin Terror fears onto medieval Islamic sects
- Debating Said’s Orientalism degenerated into motive-attribution rather than argument.
- Decontextualized polemic becomes misread as straightforward history
- Devotional critics dismissed documented Muslim slave trading as un-Islamic
- Dionysius was no more Asiatic than his Theban kin
- Early archaeology treated living Arabs as invisible to their enterprise
- Early British India was more ethnically hybrid than usually assumed
- Early crusade chroniclers felt no need to fact-check a hated subject
- Early English Arabists judged Eastern wisdom superior to Western
- Early English orientalism served homegrown Anglican church-politics disputes
- Early English Qur’an translator was a lay London solicitor
- Early European Arabic dictionaries were built on medieval Arab lexicons plus Turkish aids
- Early European Islam scholarship served Christian infighting, not accurate study
- Early Islam scholarship was a weapon in intra-Christian polemics.
- Early Islam’s defining features may have developed outside Arabia rather than at the Hijaz
- Early medieval pilgrims could walk through Muslim Jerusalem unseeing
- Early modern Christians ranked Muslims inferior by faith, not by race
- Early modern Christians read Islam as divine punishment for Eastern schisms
- Early Orientalist guilt contradicts Said’s imperialism thesis
- Early orientalists pursued Arabic scholarship at ruinous personal cost
- Early Qur’an translators claimed missionary aims to dodge church censorship
- Early Western mathematics served astrology rather than science
- Eighteenth-century French Arabic instruction read classics but ignored spoken language
- Eighteenth-century Orientalism could not support a living
- Eighteenth-century readers saw Sale’s Qur’an portrait as too pro-Muslim
- Eighteenth-century scholars studied Arabic to illuminate the Bible
- Erpenius used Turkish dictionaries to improve Arabic scholarship, though Europeans scorned Turkish itself
- Essentialism serves the rationalizing function of stereotypes more than accuracy does
- Euripides located irrationality within the individual, not the East
- European Orientalist knowledge depended heavily on native informants like Leo Africanus
- European printers lacking Arabic fonts forced scholars to transliterate Arabic into Hebrew
- European scholarship favored Arabic over the practically more useful Turkish
- European study of Arabic declined as hopes of finding scientific value in it faded
- Even a committed imperial scholar-administrator eventually turned against colonial policy.
- Even Islam’s first Christian critic treated the conquest as a passing annoyance
- Even sympathetic European scholarship ignored Islam’s living devotional spirituality
- Exile itself was central to Said’s intellectual self-fashioning
- Expedition members treated living Arabs as evidence about ancient Hebrews
- Fabricated hadiths retain value as records of later community debates
- Fake ancient Egyptian lore diverted early Egyptology into occult dead ends
- Field travel to the East shaped major Orientalist insights
- Foreign Office grants for strategic languages funded esoteric classical scholarship instead
- Franz Rosenthal’s enduring scholarly legacy rests on his Muqaddimah translation
- French thinkers rationalized Ottoman decline through several rival theories
- Gellner held that truth is independent of political virtue.
- German historicists mined Islamic history for arguments about civilization
- German Orientalists favored text editing while German readers sought broader popular accounts.
- German Orientalists led the field despite Germany having no Arab empire.
- Gibb supported Arab nationalism and denounced Zionism
- Gobineau’s actual racial pessimism contradicts his Nazi appropriation
- Gobineau’s Orientalist authority rested on amateur credentials
- Goldziher’s formulations remain the field’s basic underpinnings today
- Grand well-funded intellectual projects often end in dead ends
- Greek and Jewish outsider definitions were permeable, allowing assimilation.
- Hammer-Purgstall’s translators fabricated content by guessing from a few words
- Hermetic writings are post-Christian borrowings, not ancient Egyptian prophecy.
- Hierarchical Arab universities and limited access to Western work explain methodological stagnation
- Hodgson coined Islamdom and Islamicate to separate religion from culture
- Hostility to Islam could motivate sound, critical scholarship rather than crude polemic
- Ibn al-Haytham established light travels from object to eye
- Imperial ‘liberation’ ideology genuinely motivated volunteers and was preached in Arabic
- Incomprehensibility could shield heretical writings from punishment
- Individual religious spirtualists converted to Islam seeking a primordial tradition rejecting modernity
- Intellectually brilliant academics can be unable to train successors
- Islam has remained a dominant force in Middle Eastern life
- Islam was framed as a Mediterranean heir of Hellenism, not an Asiatic Other.
- Islamic law’s origins trace only to about a century after the Prophet’s death
- Jewish nineteenth-century Orientalists created the myth of a tolerant medieval Muslim golden age.
- Jewish scholars’ rabbinic training shaped critical Qur’anic approaches
- Jones established the Indo-European language family in 1786
- Key Orientalist scholarship shows no detectable political agenda even unconscious
- Kircher’s hieroglyph decipherment was entirely false but mystical
- Kratchkovsky mourned pupils cut down by wars and hardship in his memoir
- Lane’s Arabic-English Lexicon remains unfinished decades after his death
- Learning Arabic so quickly got scholars accused of practicing magic
- Leiden dominated European Oriental studies for two centuries
- Levant Company chaplaincies functioned as covert studentships in Arabic studies.
- Lewis’s scholarship attacked Muslim racial-prejudice and slavery myths and probed Muslim disinterest in Europe
- Lewis’s war service shaped his lifelong focus on Arabic political terminology
- Lull absorbed Sufi practices and Arabic frame-tale structure into Christian devotion
- Lull admired Arabic culture while insisting Islam was false and its followers damned
- Lull bought a Moorish slave as his Arabic teacher and struck him
- Lull deemed Muslim conversion possible only once they were subdued
- Lull studied Arabic nine years out of fear the Mongols would convert to Islam
- Lull’s Ars Magna was a rotating-wheel device meant to convert Muslims by demonstration
- Lull’s early reading of al-Ghazali shaped his later Sufi-influenced works
- Lull’s novel Blanquerna ends with its pope-hero resigning to become a hermit
- Madrasas did not exist in the Muslim world until centuries later than commonly claimed
- Major Orientalist scholarship was published in Latin into the twentieth century.
- Mandate partition of the Ottoman empire redirected archaeological access to French and British scholars
- Mandeville’s fabricated travel book circulated in hundreds of manuscripts.
- Many Orientalists wrote directly for Muslim and Arab audiences
- Marx’s orientalism concerned land tenure and government, not racial feeling
- Marxist critics read the Qur’an as bourgeois ideology promising workers otherworldly paradise
- Marxist critics saw Orientalist knowledge production as colonial accomplice
- Marxist historians pioneered writing Near Eastern history from below.
- Marxist scholars interpreted early Islam as a political and economic movement.
- Massignon aimed to study Arabic in order to demolish the Qur’an
- Massignon argued Sufism grew from the Qur’an against prevailing orthodoxy
- Massignon helped shield a Nazi-collaborating Mufti from extradition.
- Massignon’s anti-Jewish prejudice blended religion and nationalism ambiguously.
- Massignon’s veneration of al-Hallaj contradicted mainstream Muslim judgment
- Medieval anti-Islamic scholarship often went unread for centuries
- Medieval Arabic grammar looked backward to Qur’anic-era speech rather than current usage
- Medieval Christian anti-Oriental prejudice is unsourced in Greek knowledge
- Medieval Christians framed Islam as an old heresy rather than a new religion
- Medieval church leaders disagreed over whether studying Islam was safe
- Medieval European misinformation about Islam came from polemical needs, not ignorance.
- Medieval Islamic craft guilds never existed as scholars once claimed.
- Medieval learned medicine based on Galen harmed patients more than folk remedies did
- Medieval Muslims feared Christian translators would steal credit for Arabic learning
- Medieval poems mirrored crusader indulgences as Saracen parody.
- Medieval poets projected a pagan trinity onto Muslims mirroring the Christian one
- Medieval polemicists recycled general accusations of Muslim vice without personal knowledge
- Medieval readers consumed travel fiction as entertainment, not fact.
- Medieval writers copied well-phrased passages as reusable tools rather than seeking originality
- Michaelis subordinated Arabic study to biblical understanding
- Middle Eastern scholars taught Oriental studies in Russian universities
- Mill and Macaulay dismissed Indian learning without knowing any Indian language
- Missionary justifications often masked purely intellectual interest in the exotic
- Montesquieu cherry-picked obscure Oriental examples to support any argument
- Much of what medieval Europe believed was Aristotle was actually pseudepigrapha by other authors
- Muslim polemicists accused Christians of corrupting scripture and polytheism
- Muslim theologians blocked Arabic printing for centuries as desecration
- Muslims held that Jews and Christians corrupted their scriptures
- Nazi-era refugee scholars transplanted German Orientalist philology into modern Israel
- Nicholson disliked the very Arabic literature he professionally documented
- Nicholson first presented Sufi experience as genuinely valid
- Nineteenth-century Orientalism was amateur, aristocratic, and unrefereed
- Nineteenth-century Orientalists routinely collaborated with Arab and Turkish scholars
- Nineteenth-century Oxbridge was mostly clergyman training and idle gentility
- Nineteenth-century philologists saw language study as a science able to rebuild dead societies
- Nineteenth-century racists read Islamic sectarian splits as racial revolts
- Nöldeke pioneered historical dating of the Qur’anic suras that anchored later scholarship.
- Ockley’s Saracen history sparked Gibbon’s interest in Islam
- Only one of six Danish expedition members survived the journey
- Orientalism changed no scholarly practices and disturbed no imperialists
- Orientalism’s cult following grew among nonspecialists despite no corrections to its errors
- Orientalist scholars often spoke Arabic too classically for ordinary Arabs
- Orientalists and Islamic fundamentalists can converge on shared claims about Islam
- Orientalists did not invent racism, which already circulated in the street
- Ottoman advances drove European study of Islam through fear
- Ottoman decline let European merchants claim nearly diplomatic immunity
- Oxford’s Arabic chair defaulted on teaching and discouraged classes
- Patron-funded scholarship may produce better books than mass-market publishing
- Persian imperialism needed no ideological othering to justify conquest
- Persian was long misclassified as Semitic for want of proof otherwise
- Petrarch condemned Arab literature without having read it
- Philological criticisms of Islam’s origins were read as Zionist or Crusader conspiracies
- Port Royal grammarians held that language, thought, and reality perfectly mirror one another
- Post-war British Orientalism was dominated by right-wing patricians skeptical of Arab nationalism
- Postcolonial criticism developed a distinctive, often impenetrable prose style
- Postel traced Druze origins to ancient French Druids
- Poverty and debt imprisoned and killed an early English Arabist
- Practical linguists and learned elites never overlapped in studying the Ottoman world
- Printing initially amplified medieval texts rather than new knowledge
- Protestants treated biblical language study as a path to salvation.
- Published al-Tabari editions enabled analytic Islamic historiography
- Qur’anic voweling makes it unique for learning Arabic
- Qutb attributed Orientalist prejudice to inherited Crusader instincts
- Qutb declared modern Muslims effectively infidel pagans despite their nominal faith
- Rahman argued outsiders’ claims about Islam must be acceptable to Muslims
- Ranke’s secular historical method still hid a providential shaping agenda
- Reiske devoted his life to a field that would not reward him
- Renaissance scholars mined Hebrew Cabala to prove Christian truth
- Renan dismissed de Sacy as orthodox and lacking critical insight
- Renan’s Averroes study distorted sources to tell a Western rationalism fable
- Renan’s weak Arabic forced reliance on inaccurate Latin translations
- Rituals predate the mythologies and creeds built around them
- Roman numerals survived for centuries despite Arabic numerals’ superiority
- Roman wars with Persia produced no distinctive racist propaganda
- Romantic orientalism rejected Enlightenment reason in a search for lost wholeness
- Rome printed Arabic books chiefly to convert Eastern Christians
- Russia founded Oriental language schools to govern conquered Muslims
- Russian Orientalism grew directly out of imperial state-building
- Sacred geography overlays a buried and materially different Jerusalem
- Said consistently explained away the justifications of America’s enemies without endorsing them
- Said criticized scholars whose works he had not read
- Said distorted Marx’s writings in Orientalism
- Said invented a nonexistent school of Cluniac Orientalists
- Said judged Western media coverage of Muslim executions as worse than the executions
- Said lumped pro-independence scholars into one reductive lineage
- Said never corrected factual errors in Orientalism and refused to concede points
- Said studied Conrad because he too reinvented himself through writing
- Said was attacked from both Palestinian and Israeli camps.
- Said was hostile to Arab Christians despite their PLO role.
- Said’s claim about de Sacy’s role in Egypt’s expedition lacks evidence
- Said’s critique of Orientalism also suppressed Arab scholars and drew on Arab precursors
- Said’s imperialism critique only ever applies to Western empires.
- Said’s Palestinian identity was formed in exile from an Anglican colonial elite
- Said’s Palestinian-exile biography was partly fabricated and exposed in 1999
- Said’s polemic demoralized scholarship and drove an unavowed policy of Jewish exclusion.
- Said’s public polemic contrasted sharply with his private gentleness
- Said’s static-views claim nullifies Orientalism’s own historical impact
- Said’s sudden hostility to Geertz followed Geertz’s critical review of Said’s own book
- Schism and dissension signal a faith’s vitality and ongoing evolution
- Scholarly hostility to Shi’ism distorted Orientalist accounts of Islam
- Scholarly progress is driven by inherited tools, not individual genius
- Semites have no racial psychology and only reluctantly abandoned polytheism
- Seventeenth-century Europe punished study of Islam while permitting pagan classics
- Seventeenth-century hopes for scientific data in Arabic manuscripts proved false.
- Seventeenth-century Orientalist scholarship could ruin its practitioners financially and physically
- Seventeenth-century Oxford was a byword for scholarly stagnation until Laud reformed it.
- Sixteenth-century observers predicted Christian Europe’s defeat by the Ottomans
- Some nineteenth-century racists predicted non-white domination
- Source-critical Bible methods migrated to classical Greek texts
- Source-criticism of hadith was denounced as diabolical by a Harvard-trained Iranian scholar
- Soviet historiography explained Islam as bourgeois class ideology
- Soviet promises of Muslim freedom concealed campaigns of suppression
- Soviet scholars balanced anti-Islamic propaganda with recognition of Islam’s progressive movements
- Soviet scholars denied Muhammad existed and redated the Qur’an to the eleventh century
- Stereotypes can enable efficient thought rather than only distort it
- Stereotypes function primarily to rationalize prejudiced behavior.
- The abduction of Io from Argos triggered the legendary Europe-Asia conflict
- The Arab Islamic conquests swept across three continents with startling speed
- The Baphomet myth originated partly from rigged trials and fake artefacts
- The claim that Muslims cannot self-govern descends from Montesquieu’s climate theory.
- The concept of Oriental despotism was devised to justify European empire
- The Council of Vienne founded Oriental language chairs for missionary work
- The Council of Vienne’s Arabic chairs were never actually established.
- The Description de l’Egypte founded Egyptology but not Arabic studies
- The dragoman system trained practical interpreters separately from academics
- The Encyclopaedia of Islam asked European questions, not Muslim ones, about Islam
- The famous alchemist Jabir was a whole corpus, not one man
- The first Arabic-to-Latin translations were mostly about divination
- The first Christian theologian of Islam served the Umayyad caliphs
- The first European Arabic grammar shaped the standard work still used today
- The first Orientalist was also a complete lunatic
- The First World War discredited German philology as a suspect discipline
- The Inquisition deemed Postel insane rather than heretical
- The Oriental-despotism frame legitimized Western empire as a civilizing burden.
- The origin date of Orientalism is contested among multiple competing candidates
- The Qur’an was first rendered into Latin in 1143 by an Englishman
- The Qur’an’s first European vernacular translation prioritized literary polish over fidelity
- The same Arabic authors were retranslated repeatedly across centuries because few manuscripts were available
- The Second World War transformed academic Orientalism in Britain
- The term ‘Orientalist’ initially meant a proponent of local rule in India
- The Thousand and One Nights was first edited for British administrators in Calcutta
- The West first learned of Ibn Khaldun through Leo Africanus
- The word Orientalist changed meaning repeatedly over two centuries
- Tibawi held that only Muslims could interpret Islam objectively
- Tibawi saw Arab scholars of the Orientalist mode as culturally alienated
- Turkish studies barely existed in Europe before the twentieth century
- Twentieth-century Orientalists shifted from writing for peers to writing for a lay public
- Vámbéry travelled Central Asia disguised as a dervish seeking the Magyar homeland
- Vámbéry’s dinner talk on Balkan superstitions inspired Stoker’s Dracula
- Victorian English scholarship’s grammar fixation dulled the university compared to the Continent
- Volney correctly predicted Muslim resistance would doom the Egyptian invasion
- Volney predicted the Ottoman empire’s dissolution on republican grounds
- Volney read Eastern despotism through classical republican categories, not exoticism
- Volney’s travel book was an anti-imperialist warning, not an invasion blueprint
- Watt’s economic-mecca thesis about Islam’s origins was later demolished by Patricia Crone
- Wellhausen applied biblical source-criticism techniques to Islamic history
- Wellhausen read pre-Islamic Arab lore as evidence for early Hebrew life
- Wellhausen’s Islamic-period preferences were shaped by German patriotism
- Werewolfism entered medieval medicine as folkloric lore recycled from ancient Greece
- Western academic training rejects providential explanations for historical events
- Western claims about Arab scientific incapacity rested on negligible acquaintance
- Western fear of the Ottomans collapsed within a few decades
- Western scholars saw Islam as withering until the Iranian revolution changed minds
- Western study of Islamic texts long ignored living Muslims and their culture
- William Jones mastered thirteen languages and sampled twenty-eight