Evelyn Alsultany — Arabs and Muslims in the Media: Race and Representation after 9/11
267 published claims from this book.
- 24’s format normalized a permanent state of emergency as entertainment
- A single TV episode encoded four competing positions on detaining Arab Americans
- A symbolically successful black woman’s fame signals the US has overcome racism
- A viable presidential candidate had to publicly disavow any Muslim association
- Abu-Jamal reframed John Walker Lindh as rejecting white privilege rather than betraying America
- Accusing opponents of ‘sympathy’ is a rhetorical tool for redirecting debate
- Advertising-funded media gravitate toward the lowest common denominator, limiting representational change.
- Ambivalence and regret in media can legitimize racism while disavowing it.
- American legitimacy can be claimed through patriotic service and middle-class productivity, not just birth
- American national identity was partly forged through media portrayals of foreign Arabs
- American TV shifted from portraying torturers as villains to depicting heroes who torture
- Amina Lawal’s death sentence was overturned on Shari’a procedural technicalities
- Amina Lawal’s stoning case gave the abstract oppressed Muslim woman a face.
- An antitorture TV plotline can still advertise torture’s necessity through framing.
- An Oprah segment drove 1.2 million emails to a foreign government.
- Anonymous message boards enable challenges to monolithic media portrayals of Islam.
- Anonymous online viewer commentary echoes mainstream cultural critics, so dismissal as fringe is unfounded
- Anti-Muslim protesters directed explicitly sexual, violent, and religious hatred at a charity dinner
- Anti-racist TV narratives can still endorse the suspicion they supposedly rebut
- Antiracist reforms repackaged white supremacy as color blindness
- Arab and Muslim American artists form a counterpublic unsettling mainstream representations
- Arab Spring mass demonstrations falsified Western claims that Arabs reject democracy
- Arab violence is framed as illegitimate while US violence is framed as legitimate
- Artistic counter-narratives can challenge official projections of national unity.
- Audience pushback against victim narratives can enforce individual responsibility ideologies
- Audiences reject shows that teach diversity but accept those teaching threat
- Balanced media representation can mask ongoing institutional racism
- Belief that Obama was Muslim rose during his presidency and tracked with disapproval
- Branding analysis of terrorism as sympathy enforces a period of demanded non-thinking
- Bush administration lawyers cited a TV show more than the Constitution to justify torture
- Bush’s 2004 re-election hinged on moral rather than constitutional values
- CAIR’s advertising places Islam within mainstream Christian and Jewish value structures
- Choosing terrorism’s cause dictates whether the policy response is war or diplomacy
- Civil rights history is deployed to legitimate new racism against Arabs
- Cold War diplomacy promoted Black culture abroad while segregation persisted at home
- Commentators invoked root-cause logic only for ideologically sympathetic terrorists
- Commercial news now narrates events through hero-villain-victim dramatic arcs like fiction does.
- Complex explanations of terrorism are outnumbered by root-cause denials
- Complex media portrayals may not overcome entrenched prejudice against Arabs and Muslims.
- Conservative critics demanded films preserve a moral line between terrorists and their killers
- Conservative opponents of multiculturalism declared equality already achieved to dismantle affirmative action.
- Conservative rhetoric frames both terrorists and their explainers as threats to America
- Constructing outrage toward oppressors is central to building war support
- Contradictory ad campaigns expose the gap between America’s image and reality for Muslims.
- Coupling legitimate critiques with offensive traits can delegitimize an entire ideology.
- Crisis rationalizes discrimination against Arabs and Muslims while condemning it against others
- Cultural meanings emerge from convergences of multiple productions, not single sources
- Democratic states govern through a permanent state of exception rather than true crisis
- Depicting Arab victimhood invites viewers to feel benevolent rather than act
- Detainees were identified solely through race-based tips and perceptions
- Disney renamed Aladdin’s Baghdad setting to avoid Gulf War associations
- Diverse human portrayals on television may still fail against entrenched prejudice
- Diversity casting alone cannot fix racist representation while stereotypes persist
- Diversity patriotism can be deployed to defend rather than assimilate marginalized groups
- Diversity rhetoric intensifies precisely when discrimination is at its worst
- Early Hollywood films projected colonizer fantasies that legitimized colonialism through white savior tropes
- Early Hollywood Middle East films encoded their era’s colonial logic
- Elected officials voiced openly mocking rationales for ethnic profiling.
- Enlightened sexism and post-race ideology similarly deny continued inequality
- Even anti-racist writers inadvertently reproduce racist assumptions through unquestioned premises
- Ex-Muslim women turned spokespersons became media fixtures authenticating Islam’s backwardness.
- Exception-framing of U.S. racism minimizes minority plights even while representing them
- Explaining radicalization, not just identifying terrorists, is the harder task
- Far-right domestic extremists killed far more Americans than Islamist extremists after 2001
- Fear of guilt-by-association produced a form of psychological internment among Arab Americans
- Feeling sympathy for Arab Muslim victims became a marker of multicultural progress
- Feminist framing of Afghan women’s oppression concealed harm from U.S. bombing and food-aid disruption.
- Fiction can function as moral motivation for real-world military participation.
- Fictional dramatic urgency is routinely confused with realistic portrayal
- Fictional torture depictions on 24 intertwined with real Abu Ghraib revelations.
- Fictional TV dramas displaced public debate over real government policy
- Fictional TV frames delegitimize legitimate political dissent as madness
- Fictionalized Middle Eastern settings erase context and make real wars feel unreal
- Fictionalizing a terrorist’s nationality is presumed to soften offensiveness.
- First ladies and prominent women legitimized war through saving Muslim women
- Framing a land dispute as elite privilege versus common masses can win public sympathy
- Gay-rights rhetoric was coopted to justify the war on terror.
- Genuine concern for Muslim women was repurposed to justify war and racism
- Government ads depicted Muslims as thriving Americans while the state waged war on them.
- Government definitions of enemy combatant expanded far beyond the Supreme Court’s standard
- Government lawyers cited a TV character more often than the Constitution when justifying torture.
- Governments weaponize feminist rhetoric to justify wars.
- Historical racism narratives frame US racism as exceptional and thereby minimize current anti-Arab racism
- Humanizing terrorists on screen is done in carefully regulated limits
- Iraq sanctions death toll estimates range from 250,000 to over 1.5 million.
- Islamic fundamentalism is a modern by-product of Cold War ideological clashes, not ancient tradition.
- Islamic fundamentalism is a modern product of Cold War politics
- Islamic militancy emerges from politics and only converges with religion
- Jazz diplomacy promoted color-blindness abroad while segregation persisted at home
- Journalistic disclaimers about not representing all Islam are nullified by testimonial generalizations.
- Knowledge of breaking a law can disqualify someone as a victim
- Labeling disparate actors all as terrorists obscures their distinct histories and contexts.
- Legal-police TV dramas frame justice through institutions of authority
- Liberal inclusion requires minority groups to approximate dominant cultural sameness
- Liberal tolerance paradoxically justifies violence against the allegedly intolerant
- Magnifying stereotypes comically undermines their power and absurdity
- Mainstream media framed religious devotion as contrary to normative male sexuality.
- Mainstream pundits publicly defended racial profiling as rational law enforcement.
- Many Americans adopted neighbor surveillance as patriotic duty without government prompting
- McVeigh’s Oklahoma City bombing was revenge for the Waco siege
- Media and government jointly determine whose suffering merits public sympathy
- Media campaigns cannot substitute for foreign-policy change and breed suspicion when they try
- Media can present racism as both wrong and acceptable if temporary
- Media categories meant to make Muslim women visible actually silence them
- Media coverage of Arab women reinforces neocolonial interests
- Media diversity gestures enabled denial of institutionalized racism during the War on Terror
- Media euphemism and elite framing shifted public acceptance of torture after Abu Ghraib.
- Media falsely cited the Quran as having 6,666 sentences to invoke Satanic imagery.
- Media focus on foreign sexism obscures domestic violence against women
- Media framed Islamic study as deprivation and literal discomfort.
- Media framed Padilla as incurable menace while excusing white converts
- Media framed terrorism as inexplicable and used women’s oppression as its explanation
- Media frames actively exclude and delegitimize alternative realities
- Media framing of oppressed Muslim women strategically omits context to justify U.S. imperialism
- Media imagery ties Islam to violence against women to justify intervention
- Media images of Arab women shifted from harem girls to terrorists to veiled victims
- Media linked Muslim converts’ violence to failed heterosexuality rather than political motives
- Media manufactured moral outrage primes audiences to endorse intervention
- Media narratives blamed Lindh’s terrorism on unchecked liberal parenting values.
- Media portray victims as passive and faith-driven to heighten Western pity
- Media portrayals frame Muslim religious expression itself as irrational fanaticism
- Media representation does not follow a linear arc from negative to positive
- Media shifts terrorism’s cause from religion to sexual-psychological deviance yet keeps Islam as enabler.
- Media sympathy for accused terrorists depends on their social identity markers
- Media sympathy for accused terrorists is distributed along racial lines
- Media sympathy for terrorists is allocated by race, class, and gender
- Media victim narratives erase local Muslim support to justify Western salvation
- Media-cultivated outrage at Islam’s oppression of women justifies US military intervention.
- Media-produced pity for distant suffering often backfires by triggering viewer contestation.
- Mediated female confession now risks titillating men instead of politically alienating them.
- Military cadets have abandoned trained interrogation methods to imitate Jack Bauer
- Military diversity was marketed to justify global intervention as world-citizen duty
- Misinformation about religious texts functions as a tool for othering.
- More diverse media representation does not equal victory over racism
- Most Americans oppose torture yet accept specific coercive interrogation methods by wide margins
- Most Americans rejected torture while approving of its component techniques under milder labels
- Most of the world’s 1.2 billion Muslims are not Arab
- Most of the world’s Muslims are not Arab, yet media conflate the categories.
- Most War on Terror TV dramas failed to capture audiences.
- Multicultural TV representation serves as cover for legitimizing racist state policies
- Multiculturalist representations of Arabs actually legitimize racism and torture
- Muslim guests are deployed as native informants reinforcing a victim-or-escapee binary
- Muslim PR yoked heteronormative family values to national security
- Muslim women commentators function as neo-Orientalists confirming Islam’s threat to the West.
- Muslims are judged good or bad by loyalty to the US, not piety.
- Network TV dramas were split on whether crisis justified suspending civil rights.
- Network TV explains terrorism through Freudian family psychodrama rather than politics
- News juxtaposed Afghan women’s horrors against liberation images to justify war
- News media adoption of an activist’s loaded label mislabeled the build site
- News media but not TV dramas circulated the oppressed Muslim woman rescue narrative
- News media cited McVeigh’s Waco grievance as a root cause
- News media obscured that Lindh fought against an Afghan faction, not the United States
- News media word choice after Abu Ghraib normalized acceptance of torture
- Newsweek fabricated Quran sentence counts to demonize Lindh via satanic numerology
- Obama’s Muslim rumor grew after his election despite his public Christian identification
- On-screen diversity in casting can mask rather than correct racial stereotyping.
- One activist’s loaded label framed media coverage of the mosque controversy
- Online fan communities can hold TV producers accountable for scripts
- Online viewers praised Sleeper Cell for teaching the Muslim threat, not diversity
- Ordinary viewers praised the show for teaching threat rather than diversity
- Organized Arab and Muslim groups actively engage media to reshape their own representation
- Outrage at Muslim women’s suffering gets weaponized to justify racist war policies
- Pity persists as irrational mediation of reason, becoming vice
- Pity presupposes inequality while empathy requires equal standing
- Pity toward the oppressed naturally becomes outrage at their oppressors
- Political leaders’ anti-Muslim slander correlates with a wave of everyday anti-Muslim incidents
- Popular TV can shift public views on torture by linking it to patriotism.
- Portraying terrorists as failed heterosexuals suppresses analysis of political causes
- Positive media portrayals of the enemy sustain racist policies by projecting benevolence
- Post-race declarations let opponents of race-based remedies appear noble.
- Postracial discourse recurred at landmark moments of racial contest since 1865.
- Postracial discourse recurs at each peak of racial progress
- Potential for terrorism frames Muslim men as guilty regardless of actual crimes.
- Presidential candidates and a Supreme Court justice invoked a TV character to justify torture.
- Presidentially coined labels created a legal category that suspends constitutional rights.
- Procedural technicalities, not political pressure, overturned Amina Lawal’s stoning sentence.
- Propaganda campaigns link Islam to heterosexual family values and national security
- PSAs tried to legitimize Muslim Americanness through patriotic service rather than heritage alone
- Public diplomacy politicized the international spread of American popular culture
- Public diplomacy that is tied to policy goals inherently compromises its journalistic credibility
- Publicly funded networks take more diversity risks than commercial ones
- Publicly funded TV networks can take creative risks that profit-driven ones avoid
- Racial-profiling debates erase Arab American self-representation and voice.
- Racialized groups are admitted to US culture only as patriots or victims
- Racism now operates through sympathetic representation and self-denial
- Repeated terrorist imagery on TV normalizes anti-Muslim prejudice
- Representative diversity in media can co-opt rather than defeat racism
- Resistance efforts can be complicit with the very exclusionary power they oppose
- Resistance strategies can quietly reproduce the very exclusions they contest
- Root-cause explanations for terrorism are applied selectively based on political sympathy
- Rotating villain ethnicity is a standard TV strategy to avoid racial stereotyping.
- Seemingly anti-stereotypical TV portrayals legitimize racist policies
- Seemingly progressive TV diversity can legitimize racist policies and torture
- Sexual explanations substitute for political explanations of terrorism.
- Sexual-deviance accusations functioned as a state tool to mark Muslims as dangerous
- Shame’s bleakness stems as much from its omissions as from its content.
- Simplified complex representations fail to change viewers’ anti-Muslim stereotypes
- Simplifying complex representations of Arabs in TV fails to change audience perceptions
- Sleeper Cell’s diverse terrorist cast deliberately separated Arab and Muslim identities.
- State-funded journalism loses credibility because its goals and ethics inherently conflict
- Stories of oppression outweigh stories of success in emotional impact
- Studying non-Arab converts reveals how Islam is racialized apart from ethnicity
- Superficial diversity strategies conceal rather than resolve persistent representational racism
- Sympathetic Arab representations became standardized during the War on Terror
- Sympathetic media portrayals can function as a new form of racism legitimizing exclusionary policy.
- Sympathetic media portrayals can legitimize racism by denying it operates
- Sympathetic media portrayals can mask ongoing racist policy
- Sympathetic media portrayals coincided with a 1600 percent surge in anti-Arab hate crimes.
- Sympathetic media portrayals still legitimize denying Arabs and Muslims rights
- Sympathetic minority depictions can reinforce rather than reduce racism.
- Sympathetic TV portrayals can still legitimize suspicion of all Arabs as threats
- Sympathetic TV portrayals coexisted with a 1600 percent surge in anti-Muslim hate crimes
- Sympathy for select enemies functions as a post-race performance of enlightenment
- Sympathy functions as the primary device for positive media representation in the post-race era
- Terrorism coverage explains Muslim converts’ violence via failed heterosexual masculinity
- Terrorism coverage substitutes reductive identity explanations for political and historical context.
- Terrorism explanations via Muslim fundamentalism erase the political roots of militancy
- The ‘I am an American’ PSA excluded all visible Arab, Muslim, or Sikh markers
- The ads promised prosperity abroad that contradicted restrictive immigration policy
- The Amina Lawal stoning case became a face for the media’s oppressed-Muslim-woman trope
- The causal explanation chosen for terrorism dictates which solutions become politically viable
- The diversity PSA celebrating American pluralism contained no Arab, Muslim, or Sikh participants
- The exceptionalism logic enabled torture, invasions, and mass deportations.
- The Gulf War military was rebranded as a multicultural force to justify intervention.
- The Lindh story framed terrorism as a product of liberal permissiveness unchecked
- The PSA’s inclusive message required all participants to speak English, even immigrants with accents
- The show paired Muslim stereotyping with a counter-stereotype of ignorant Americans
- The sleeper-cell threat erased distinctions between Arab Muslims and American citizens in public suspicion
- The State Department spent 15 million on ads marketing America to Muslims
- The state of exception has become the norm in Western democracies.
- The term terrorism flattened diverse political violence into one undifferentiated category
- The TV show 24 shifted public opinion to tolerate torturing Arabs and Muslims
- The TV show 24 shifted public opinion toward accepting torture
- The U.S. public conflates Arab and South Asian identities
- The War on Terror produced homonationalism, absorbing some gays while marking Muslims deviant
- The word freedom now signals American imperialism in Muslim-majority audiences
- These PSAs scripted Muslim self-definition as the path to national inclusion
- Three PSA campaigns each reproduced restrictive forms of diversity inclusion
- Tolerance-themed diversity campaigns can exclude the very Americans they claim to include
- TV drama political stances are diluted by the pursuit of the widest audience
- TV drama shifted blame for anti-Arab violence away from police
- TV dramas and government PR jointly normalized torture in the War on Terror.
- TV dramas can avoid stereotyping yet still legitimize real-world torture policies
- TV dramas can preempt stereotyping accusations by depicting both moderate and extreme Muslims.
- TV dramas evoke sympathy, remorse, and mourning to position viewers as benevolent
- TV dramas helped constitute a public that could debate the War on Terror
- TV dramas insert moderate Muslim characters to avoid stereotyping all Muslims
- TV dramas legitimize racism by framing it as a temporary crisis response
- TV dramas offer grievance backstories but ultimately reframe them as illegitimate
- TV networks’ profit motive perpetuates core ethnic stereotypes despite cosmetic diversity
- TV torture portrayals influenced real military interrogation practices in Iraq.
- TV verdicts can rebrand surveillance as courtroom drama
- Twentieth-century Arab media portrayals fixated on exotic and terrorist stereotypes.
- U.S. anti-Muslim rhetoric framed Muslim identity as a permanent stain disqualifying one from office
- U.S. citizenship law mandated whiteness as a prerequisite until 1952.
- U.S. sanctions on Iraq killed up to 1.5 million people, mostly children
- Unresolved Muslim grievances enable justifications for U.S. power abuse under multiculturalism’s banner.
- US interrogators deliberately weaponized Islamic etiquette and religious imagery against detainees.
- US media framed Arab geopolitical acts as irrational rather than legitimate protest
- US queer liberalism and anti-immigrant homophobia claims are linked
- Victims of anti-Arab hate crimes were also treated as terrorist suspects, eroding institutional trust
- Viewers use TV dramas to confirm preexisting suspicions about what is real.
- Watchdog monitoring forced TV writers to abandon overt ethnic stereotyping
- Western and US intervention historically fueled Islamic fundamentalism as resistance
- What a story omits shapes audience sympathy as much as what it shows.
- Who merits public sympathy is politically determined rather than natural
- Winning the War on Terror required ideological hegemony alongside military force