Unipolar opinion convergence dominates deliberation studies more often than bipolar divergence

Evidence

Within idea-based polarization (53 articles), two main forms are to be disentangled: unipolar convergence and bipolar divergence. The former, i.e., the process of attitudes converging toward one specific extreme (usually the one consistent with the groups pre-deliberation opinions), is observed in 27 articles (50.9%). The latter, which observes the creation of two (or more) poles within the group, figures centrally in 19 studies (32.1%). — Didier Caluwaerts et al., Deliberation and Polarization, 88

Categorization

  • ADDENDUM: Relevant to the reader’s search for depolarization-by-deliberation findings: most ‘depolarization’ effects found are actually unipolar convergence, not true polar splitting.
  • XREF: connects to: Latent public opinion rarely diverges from expressed collective policy preferences — Martin Gilens and Benjamin I. Page, Testing Theories of American Politics:…, 22; Deliberation reduces polarization mainly in political science studies — Didier Caluwaerts et al., Deliberation and Polarization: A…, 108; Deliberation reduces affective polarization but often increases idea-based polarization. — Didier Caluwaerts et al., Deliberation and Polarization: A…, 107 (+3 more)

Broader Connections