Deliberation reduces polarization mainly in political science studies
Evidence
What the results furthermore tell us, is that the direction of the effect varies according to discipline (see Table 4). 59% of the articles published in political science journals report that deliberation can reduce polarization, whereas this effect is only reported in 17% of the social psychology studies. Social psychologists (paralleling the findings from the remaining disciplines) report much more often (in 61% of the cases) that group discussion actually increases polarization. — Didier Caluwaerts et al., Deliberation and Polarization, 108
Categorization
- XREF: connects to: Deliberation depolarizes only when structured by deliberative-democracy design features, otherwise discussion polarizes. — Didier Caluwaerts et al., Deliberation and Polarization: A…, 18; Unipolar opinion convergence dominates deliberation studies more often than bipolar divergence — Didier Caluwaerts et al., Deliberation and Polarization: A…, 88; Deliberation reduces affective polarization but often increases idea-based polarization. — Didier Caluwaerts et al., Deliberation and Polarization: A…, 107 (+6 more)
Broader Connections
- Deliberation reduces affective polarization but often increases idea-based polarization.
#qualifies(0.85) — Didier Caluwaerts et al., Deliberation and Polarization, 107 - Mediated rather than face-to-face deliberation tends to polarize groups
#complicates(0.82) — Didier Caluwaerts et al., Deliberation and Polarization, 123 - Facilitated deliberation depolarizes participants while unfacilitated deliberation polarizes them.
#expands(0.80) — Didier Caluwaerts et al., Deliberation and Polarization, 121 - Depolarization requires deliberation framed by deliberative-democracy conditions.
#qualifies(0.78) — Didier Caluwaerts et al., Deliberation and Polarization, 136 - Communicative encounters depolarize only when framed as deliberative democracy practices.
#qualifies(0.76) — Didier Caluwaerts et al., Deliberation and Polarization, 136 - The act of public deliberation outweighs its actual argumentative content in easing conflict
#expands(0.75) — Jürgen Habermas, A New Structural Transformation of the…, 78