Deliberation reduces polarization mainly in political science studies

Evidence

What the results furthermore tell us, is that the direction of the effect varies according to discipline (see Table 4). 59% of the articles published in political science journals report that deliberation can reduce polarization, whereas this effect is only reported in 17% of the social psychology studies. Social psychologists (paralleling the findings from the remaining disciplines) report much more often (in 61% of the cases) that group discussion actually increases polarization. — Didier Caluwaerts et al., Deliberation and Polarization, 108

Categorization

  • XREF: connects to: Deliberation depolarizes only when structured by deliberative-democracy design features, otherwise discussion polarizes. — Didier Caluwaerts et al., Deliberation and Polarization: A…, 18; Unipolar opinion convergence dominates deliberation studies more often than bipolar divergence — Didier Caluwaerts et al., Deliberation and Polarization: A…, 88; Deliberation reduces affective polarization but often increases idea-based polarization. — Didier Caluwaerts et al., Deliberation and Polarization: A…, 107 (+6 more)

Broader Connections