Tempels shifted from colonial monologue to dialogical method after observing mission failure.
Related
- The monologue form makes readers complicit in the Othering the novel critiques (similarity 0.82)
- Tempels neither invented nor discovered Bantu philosophy. (similarity 0.82)
- Monologue has characterized colonial encounters since the Hellenistic empire and cost millions of lives (similarity 0.81)
- Monologue has dominated colonial encounters since the Hellenistic empire. (similarity 0.81)
- Official colonial correspondence was saturated by speculative, contested street-level voices. (similarity 0.81)
- Tempels had no university training beyond seminary before writing Bantu Philosophy (similarity 0.81)
- Tempels held that Africans express thought only through ritual, not discourse (similarity 0.80)
- The dialectic is the marrow of historiography and political science, not formal logic. (similarity 0.80)
- The dialogue problem Tempels faced persists in the post-colonial era. (similarity 0.79)
- Crahay faulted Tempels for conflating lived with reflective philosophy. (similarity 0.79)
- Evangelization failure led Tempels to dialogue-based mission methods. (similarity 0.79)
- Leaving key emotion-words untranslated resists monolingual Western hegemony over meaning (similarity 0.79)
- Colonial sentiment discipline targeted colonizers themselves, not only the colonized (similarity 0.78)
- Historians should read along the colonial grain before reading against it (similarity 0.78)
- The failure of missionary evangelization in Africa motivated the writing of Bantu Philosophy (similarity 0.78)