Dialogue becomes action only when it can change something.

Evidence

Dialogue is action when it contains the possibility of change. A crucial (and sometimes difficult) distinction to make is between speech that is mere discussion or debate and speech that is drama or action. If in doubt, ask yourself: Can this conversation between characters really change anything? When two characters have made up their minds and know each other’s positions on some political or philosophical matter, for instance, they may argue with splendid eloquence but there will be no discovery and nothing to decide, and therefore no opportunity for change. No matter how significant their topic, we are likely to find them wooden and uninteresting. … In order to engage us emotionally in a disagreement, the characters must have an emotional stake in the outcome; we need to feel that, even if it’s unlikely they will change their minds, they might change their lives. — Janet Burroway; Elizabeth Stuckey-French; Ned Stuckey-French, Writing Fiction, Tenth Edition, 188

Categorization

  • XREF: Connects to fiction craft discussions about conflict and stakes in other writing guides. — connects to: Change comes only through action, not passive acceptance or endurance — bell hooks, Ain’t I a Woman_ Black Women and…, 557; Dialogic approaches view human systems as riddled with tensionality requiring articulation of constituting tensions — Dialogic Perspectives - Communication; Dialogic interactions create open, critical, constructive spaces for negotiating differing ideas toward consensus — ‘Dialogic scaffolding’: Enhancing learning and understanding in collaborative contexts (+3 more)

Broader Connections