Social-identity and privilege threats also deter collective guilt beyond reparation costs.

Evidence

Deterrents to collective guilt are not limited to the diffi culty of reparations. Other deterrents to collective guilt (i.e. reasons for not engaging in reparations) might include the costs that reparations incur in terms of the social identity of dominant group members. Establishing egalitarian intergroup relations is likely to result in real material costs (in terms of resources and power) to high-status groups, and reductions in the privileges and status that some groups hold over others are likely to result in costs to the social identities of high-status groups. — Michael T. Schmitt, Daniel A. Miller, Nyla R. Branscombe, and Jack W. Brehm, The Difficulty of Making Reparations…, 73

Categorization

  • XREF: Extends the synthesis claim by naming identity/status costs, not just material reparation difficulty, as deterrents. — connects to: Collective guilt follows an inverted-U curve peaking when reparations require moderate effort. — Nyla R. Branscombe and Bertjan Doosje (eds.), Collective Guilt: International…, 574; Guilt is maximized when reparation costs are moderate or uncertain. — Nyla R. Branscombe and Bertjan Doosje (eds.), Collective Guilt: International…, 580; Collective guilt is contested through ideological debate between privileged and disadvantaged groups. — Nyla R. Branscombe and Bertjan Doosje (eds.), Collective Guilt: International…, 592 (+4 more)

Broader Connections