Group members feel collective guilt for historical ingroup harm they did not cause.

Evidence

Doosje et al. (1998) showed that people who were not personally involved in wrongdoing still experienced collective guilt upon learning that their ingroup had historically harmed an outgroup. This guilt prompted them to ask for higher compensations benefiting the outgroup, signaling their motivation to address moral obligations of the ingroup despite their lack of personal wrongdoing. — Nurit Shnabel and Johannes Ullrich, Identity Needs in Intergroup Relations, 56

Categorization

  • XREF: Directly reinforces the asymmetry claim: perpetrator-group members’ motivation centers on moral-identity repair, generating reparative prosocial action. — connects to: Collective guilt is felt when the self’s group illegitimately harmed another group — Nyla R. Branscombe and Bertjan Doosje (eds.), Collective Guilt: International…, 0; Group members legitimize their ingroup’s harmful actions to avoid guilt — Nyla R. Branscombe and Bertjan Doosje (eds.), Collective Guilt: International…, 53; Collective guilt requires group membership recognition plus perceived group responsibility for a humanitarian violation. — Nyla R. Branscombe and Bertjan Doosje (eds.), Collective Guilt: International…, 791 (+10 more)
  • ADDENDUM: Supports the victim-perpetrator asymmetry in the reader’s existing synthesis within this psychology chapter.

Broader Connections