Resilience is an emergent group process, not a pre-existing personality trait.

Evidence

In summary, derived from basic principles of self-categorisation theory, the London bombs study suggested that shared social identity is the psychological mechanism operating between common fate (understood as an example of comparative fit; Turner, 1981) and collectively resilient behaviours. The ‘resilience’ concept was commonly in use in psychiatrically oriented research on disasters, where it was typically treated as a personal disposition (NATO, 2009). By contrast to this notion of personal resilience as a pre-existing capacity of individuals, the social identity model focused on collective resilience as an emergent process located in the emergency itself (Williams & Drury, 2009; Ntontis et al., 2018, 2019). — John Drury and Evangelos Ntontis, A SOCIAL IDENTITY MODEL OF COLLECTIVE…, 21

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Clarifies the core shift in meaning of ‘resilience’ that the social identity program introduced.
  • XREF: Echoes the reader’s ongoing critique of individualizing framings across topics (cf. Deep Listening and mental approaches elsewhere in reading). — connects to: Coordinated evacuation depends on organisation, not on the absence of emotion. — John Drury, The role of social identity processes…, 83