The solidarity model extends beyond disasters to political violence and repression.
Evidence
Some of the emergency incidents described so far comprise conscious attacks (or perceived attacks) of one group on another, rather than disasters. Therefore, there is a case for exploring the application of the social identity model of collective resilience to the behaviour and experiences of civilians in contexts of political violence and repression. — John Drury and Evangelos Ntontis, A SOCIAL IDENTITY MODEL OF COLLECTIVE…, 28
Categorization
- SEED: Angle: if collective resilience operates under armed state repression too, that strengthens the claim that solidarity forms through common fate independent of any disaster frame — promising for the reader’s thesis.
- XREF: connects to: Negative sanctions and repression typically precede and provoke collective political violence — John T. Jost and Jim Sidanius, Political Psychology, 4357
Related
- Shared social identity is the causal variable predicting solidarity among disaster strangers. (similarity 0.81)
- Collective resilience theory now yields practical guidance for disaster practitioners. (similarity 0.80)
- Resilience is an emergent group process, not a pre-existing personality trait. (similarity 0.79)
- Negative sanctions and repression typically precede and provoke collective political violence (similarity 0.78)
- Pre-disaster social bonds cannot explain solidarity among strangers during crises. (similarity 0.78)
- Shared emergent identity from common fate explains collective support amid disasters (similarity 0.78)
Broader Connections
- Negative sanctions and repression typically precede and provoke collective political violence
#expands(0.75) — John T. Jost and Jim Sidanius, Political Psychology, 4357