Courts deny Muslims anti-racism protection when they lack shared self-identification

Evidence

The Appeals Tribunal acknowledged the racialization of Muslims following the War on Terror, noting that they had been ‘treated as a “single community” which is regarded as “suspect” as potential terrorists or sympathisers of terrorism’ and ‘are grouped together based upon their practices and looks’ (para 100). However, the Tribunal found that there was no objective evidence that Australian Muslims ‘regard themselves as being a distinct community irrespective of their different ethnic origins, religious traditions (conservative or liberal, Sunni or Shia), place of birth or how long they have lived in Australia’. (para 101) Consequently, the Appeals Tribunal found that Muslims were not a race for the purpose of discrimination law. — Mareike Riedel, Islamophobia, Racial Discrimination…, 55

Categorization

  • QUESTION: The tribunal acknowledges Muslims are racially profiled as a single suspect group yet denies them race protection for lack of internal unity — a paradox worth probing.
  • XREF: Connects to the reader’s core legal question about misperception-based claims failing when self-identification is required. — connects to: Muslims were told anti-Muslim racism cannot exist because Muslims are not a race — Runnymede Trust (ed. Farah Elahi & Omar Khan), Islamophobia: Still a Challenge for Us…, 583; Muslims’ racial diversity undermines race-based legal claims; Muslims get racialized via projected religious ancestry regardless of self-understanding — Mareike Riedel, Islamophobia, Racial Discrimination…, 64 (+3 more)
  • recurring: this claim recurs 3 times within its source

Broader Connections