Miles and Brown argue anti-Muslim phenomena fit existing racism and xenophobia theories

Evidence

Whilst Halliday argues that Islamophobia is inappropriate because of the foci, Miles and Brown suggest that ‘Islamophobia’ might only be appropriate where a specific and identifiable hatred of the theology of Islam is in evidence. Whilst seemingly arguing the same as Halliday albeit from an alternative perspective, Miles and Brown argue that there is no need for any separation of identifying, defining or conceptualising ‘anti-Muslimism’ as this can be incorporated and framed within existing theories of racism or xenophobia, in similarity of anti-immigrant phenomena. For both Halliday and Miles and Brown, it is the linguistic meaning of the name that neither adequately defines nor allows understanding of what the phenomenon is, thus rendering it misleading and inappropriate. — Chris Allen, Islamophobia, 687

Categorization

  • XREF: connects to: Anti-Muslim discrimination should be fought through existing anti-racism frameworks — A. Hussain, N. Meer, Framing Muslim Integration, 58; Separating Islamophobia as ideology from racism undermines anti-racist struggle — Runnymede Trust (ed. Farah Elahi & Omar Khan), Islamophobia: Still a Challenge for Us…, 159; Anti-Islamic and anti-Muslim attitudes are distinct but overlapping targets of prejudice (+7 more)

Broader Connections