Late twentieth-century Islamophobia shifted from Orientalist exoticism toward politicised and militarised framing

Evidence

In the latter part of the twentieth century, that which was understood and made known about Islam and Muslims was more salient than that in circulation in earlier historical paradigmatic contexts, particularly those ideas that encapsulated the Orient as sensual, despotic, backward, promiscuous, aberrant, irrational and mysterious. In fact in many ways, even the term ‘the Orient’ had become somewhat redundant and misplaced. This is not to say that a complete break with the past had occurred. Some of the more historically resonant meanings and understandings about Islam and Muslims continued to persist, irregularly cropping up in some of the most unpredictable representations. Whilst Orientalism and its discourses therefore remain vitally important in the broader contextual landscapes, the latter half of the twentieth century’s modes of approaching, interacting, understanding and explaining Islam and Muslims were played out through arenas that were far more politicised and militarised and maybe less Orientalised. This transition has fed into and transformed many of the historical givens about Islam and Muslims, bringing about a greater sense of mistrust and doubt, and sometimes even outright hatred. — Chris Allen, Islamophobia, 214

Categorization

  • XREF: Connects directly to Said’s ‘Orientalism’ and the field’s central argument this text is participating in. — connects to: Islamophobic narratives shifted from vulgar cartoons to acceptable generalized suspicion — Runnymede Trust (ed. Farah Elahi & Omar Khan), Islamophobia: Still a Challenge for Us…, 81; Global events normalized Islamophobic discourse and made Muslims the ultimate Other — Runnymede Trust (ed. Farah Elahi & Omar Khan), Islamophobia: Still a Challenge for Us…, 255; Islamophobia is rooted in centuries of religion-politics-warfare conflict — Chris Allen, Islamophobia, 164 (+6 more)

Broader Connections