Even sympathetic Orientalists denied the Orient modernity by casting it as ancient and Semitic.

Evidence

As Hussain states, this process established ‘an absolute and systematic difference between the West … and the Orient, which is aberrant, undeveloped and inferior’. More worrying for him though, and in offering some explanation of what was to follow, Hussain explains that what emerged was a notion and preconception of the Orient that was ‘uniform and incapable of defining itself … either to be feared … or to be controlled’. — Chris Allen, Islamophobia, 188 (#expands, via linked claim)

Throughout the book, he returns repeatedly to a common theme in Orientalist writings: the assumption that the Orient is fundamentally different from and inferior to the West. If “the Orient is irrational, depraved (fallen), childlike, ‘different,’” writes Said, then “the European is rational, virtuous, mature, ‘normal.’” — Green, Todd H, The Fear of Islam_ An Introduction to…, 206 (#expands, via linked claim)

Categorization

  • XREF: connects to: Orientalist writings assumed the Orient was inferior and childlike — Green, Todd H, The Fear of Islam_ An Introduction to…, 206; Orientalism fixed the Orient as uniform, undeveloped, and incapable of self-definition — Chris Allen, Islamophobia, 188; Latent Orientalism denies the Orient any possibility of development or transformation (+1 more)

Broader Connections