Global social fields can form from micro interactions without complex organization.

Evidence

The basic insight that motivates this undertaking and for which we will herein provide evidence is that global social forms—by which we mean fields of interaction that stretch across all time zones (or have the potential to do so)—need not imply further expansions of social complexity along the lines of highly differentiated organizations or complex social control and authority structures. Rather, the installation of global social forms that are not nationally bound would seem to be largely dependent on individuals and social microstructures. Perhaps it only becomes feasible at all in relation to such structures. To characterize these structures, we have introduced a distinction between embodied presence and response presence—that is, embodied presence corresponds to the face-to-face situation, while response presence corresponds to situations in which participants are capable of responding to one another and common objects in real time without being physically present in the same place. — Karin Knorr Cetina & Urs Bruegger, Global Microstructures, 26

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Introduces embodied presence vs. response presence as core conceptual tools for analyzing screen-based markets.
  • XREF: Connects to the reader’s trading ethnography in that response presence is the defining feature of screen-based trading—relates to Knorr Cetina’s interactional structuration of electronic markets. — connects to: Space is not freedom but permanent construction through contested social interactions; Microsocial interactions have risen to structural equivalence with macroscopic global phenomena. — Karin Knorr Cetina & Urs Bruegger, Global Microstructures: The Virtual…, 18; Global markets are assembled through microsocial patterns of relatedness and coordination — Donald MacKenzie, An Engine, Not a Camera: How Financial…, 1086 (+1 more)

Broader Connections