Geographically dispersed but mutually oriented actors form global microstructures that bind markets together.

Evidence

Since microsociology has not traditionally been thought of as particularly pertinent to issues of globalization or to the understanding of markets when they are stretched out in geographical space, some explanation is necessary to clarify the precise nature of microsociology’s relevance and the contribution that can be made to it in this area. What we suggest in this article is that ïŹelds in which participants, although geographically distant, are oriented, above all, toward one another and, at the same time, disengaged from local settings are spanned and bound together by global microstructures—that is, patterns of relatedness and coordination that are global in scope but microsocial in character and that assemble and link global domains. — Karin Knorr Cetina & Urs Bruegger, Global Microstructures, 18

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Introduces the core concept ‘global microstructures’ — patterns of relatedness global in scope but microsocial in character. Central to the whole paper.
  • XREF: Connects to Goffman’s interaction order and to economic sociology’s market theory; also resonates with my ethnography-of-traders reading on screen-based markets. — connects to: Global markets are assembled through microsocial patterns of relatedness and coordination — Donald MacKenzie, An Engine, Not a Camera: How Financial
, 1086; Markets operate as processual social systems shaped by trader practice, knowledge, and globality — Karin Knorr Cetina & Urs Bruegger, Global Microstructures: The Virtual
, 35; Microsocial interactions have risen to structural equivalence with macroscopic global phenomena. — Karin Knorr Cetina & Urs Bruegger, Global Microstructures: The Virtual
, 18 (+5 more)

Broader Connections