Financialization cannot be reduced to stock market developments.

Evidence

It reveals that the upward surge in portfolio income in the last three decades was largely accounted for by increases in the interest component,rather than by capital gains,which merely held steady over the period, or dividends, which lost share relative to the other two components. This is a surprising result,and it argues strongly against reducing financialization to developments in the stock market. While there clearly is a relationship between financialization and the bull market of the 1980s and 1990s,it is a more indirect one than is commonly assumed,at least as reflected by this measure. — Greta R. Krippner, The Financialization of the American…, 66

Categorization

  • XREF: Challenges the common popular equation of financialization with ā€˜the stock market boom’ — connects to broader critical finance literature distinguishing interest-bearing accumulation from equity speculation.
  • QUESTION: Why did interest income specifically surge over capital gains? Worth chasing the decomposition of portfolio income for non-financial firms.