Financialization does not measurably raise firm profits or financial-asset productivity.

Evidence

We find no growth in the productivity of financial assets, and financial assets consistently underperformed nonfinancial assets in the production function. We also developed a firm-level analysis that indicates that financialization does not translate into higher profit. Firms that reported interest income or financial investment or owned a financial subsidiary did not earn significantly more pretax income than other firms. In fact, industrywide dependence on financial income is associated with a future decline in profits for nonfinance firms in the period of analysis ưsee app. Fƞ. — Ken-Hou Lin & Donald Tomaskovic-Devey, Financialization and U.S. Income…, 179

Categorization

  • DEEPTHINKING: A direct empirical rebuttal to the marginal productivity justification for finance-driven compensation — the core load-bearing finding of the chapter.
  • QUESTION: Worth chasing where the appendix F firm-level analysis and its specification live, since the ā€˜future decline in profits’ result is causally suggestive.
  • ADDENDUM: Parallels the ā€˜Complaints About Immodesty Go Way Back’ thread that claims of financial worth are ideology-loaded, though the fit is loose.
  • XREF: connects to: Financialization must be measured by profit generation, not employment or output — Greta R. Krippner, The Financialization of the American…, 14; Financialization means accumulation through financial channels rather than production — Greta R. Krippner, The Financialization of the American…, 11; Finance manages rather than creates value under capitalism. — Max Haiven, Cultures of Financialization, 98 (+1 more)

Broader Connections