Financialised valuations override prior forms of valuation and reshape how people act and identify

Evidence

I use the concept of colonisation with a primarily metaphorical meaning: the ingraining of financialised metrics and reasonings in spaces and situations where they were previously non-existent or less common, which tends to reduce the importance of prior forms of valuation, changing the ecology of the holds available for action and maybe even the modes of subjectification. … The Habermassian and critical connotation of the concept of colonisation is assumed as these forms relate to strategic action rather than communicative action, constituting a specific mode of rationalisation which I believe may lead to a loss of freedom and meaning. — Ève Chiapello, Financialisation of Valuation, 16

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Defines ‘colonisation’ as the ingraining of financialised metrics into spaces where they didn’t exist, reducing prior valuation forms.
  • XREF: Connects to Habermas’s lifeworld/system colonization and to Power’s audit pathologies of decoupling vs. colonisation. — connects to: Financialised reasoning can colonise non-monetary measures like scores and percentages. — Ève Chiapello, Financialisation of Valuation, 11; Financialisation also colonizes non-economic spheres via valuation techniques. — Ève Chiapello, Financialisation of Valuation, 15; Investor-style valuation techniques now shape public policy with coercive force — Ève Chiapello, Financialisation of Valuation, 108 (+10 more)
  • ADDENDUM: Could serve as a theoretical frame for extending ‘On Sacrifice’ — how colonising metrics displace prior ritual/gift forms of valuation.

Broader Connections