Financialised reasoning can colonise non-monetary measures like scores and percentages.

Evidence

An important distinction is made between ā€ļ¬nancialā€ or ā€monetisedā€ quanti- fications and ā€ļ¬nancialisedā€ quantifications. The boundary of the financialisation of conventions does not lie between monetary quantifications and other types of quantification, but makes distinctions inside those two groups. Some monetary quantifications do not use financialised conventions but nevertheless end up as a financial figure. In contrast, some non-monetary quantifications, for example certain scores or percentages, are rooted in financialised reasoning even if they are not expressed in monetary units. — ƈve Chiapello, Financialisation of Valuation, 11

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Core conceptual distinction: ā€˜financialized’ quantifications are defined by their underlying reasoning convention, not by their currency units.
  • XREF: Connects to financialization-of-everything literature and to the reader’s theme of how financialized valuation colonizes non-financial activity. — connects to: Financialisation also colonizes non-economic spheres via valuation techniques. — ƈve Chiapello, Financialisation of Valuation, 15; Money carries multiple frames of value beyond its economic function — Max Haiven, Cultures of Financialization, 386; Financialization means finance’s logics penetrate the fabric of everyday life — Max Haiven, Cultures of Financialization, 72 (+1 more)

Broader Connections