Financialization treats risk as probabilisable, displacing close knowledge of the object valued

Evidence

A redefinition of the concept of risk thus resulted, as risks are conceived by financial theory as probabilisable. Consideration of risks in finance assumes it is possible to conduct analyses of a large number of events that can calibrate statistical forecasting models based on the law of large numbers. Statistical analysis of risk and the study of volatilities has become more important than close knowledge. The discount rate used to calculate NPV has also become justified by the risk the investor bears. Any investment must have a higher return than a bank deposit, because an investment is riskier. — ƈve Chiapello, Financialisation of Valuation, 35

Categorization

  • DEEPTHINKING: The claim that statistical analysis of risk has ā€˜become more important than close knowledge’ is the pivot of financialized valuation colonizing non-financial activity — the epistemic shift is dense enough to sit with.
  • ADDENDUM: This directly supports ā€˜On Sacrifice’ if read loosely — no. Better: it extends the ā€˜Grafting & Growth’ article? No. Actually it best serves the reader’s stated theme of financialized valuation colonizing non-financial spheres: probabilizable risk replacing judgment.
  • XREF: connects to: Systemic risk is emergent and irreducible to the sum of individual risks — Mark Blyth, Austerity: The History of a Dangerous…, 134; The bell-curve shape of Gaussian distributions is what banks’ risk models assume; Financialised valuations override prior forms of valuation and reshape how people act and identify — ƈve Chiapello, Financialisation of Valuation, 16 (+18 more)

Broader Connections