F.L.N. hard-liners treated negotiations as stalling devices to gain time.

Evidence

Despite the collapse of his initiatives in October, over the next nine months Abbas visited no less than fifteen foreign capitals in pursuit of a new peace formula. Then, disillusioned, he withdrew increasingly from the scene. Abbas, it may be assumed, was quite genuine in his pursuit still of some kind of compromise peace solution; the same cannot be said of the increasingly powerful hard-liners behind the G.P.R.A. by whom negotiations were regarded primarily as a device for getting France involved in an endless procedure, which would provide the F.L.N. with time it so badly needed in 1958–9, and, by wearing down the patience of the enemy negotiators, eventually lead to peace on F.L.N. terms. — Horne, Alistair, A Savage War of Peace- Algeria 1954-1962, 977

Categorization

  • XREF: connects to: Army hard-liners like Boumedienne drove the F.L.N.’s negotiators to intransigence.; Rigid F.L.N. negotiating terms outlasted France’s shifting war aims — Horne, Alistair, A Savage War of Peace- Algeria 1954-1962, 450; Recognition of the F.L.N. as sole negotiating partner was the core deadlock — Horne, Alistair, A Savage War of Peace- Algeria 1954-1962, 1165

Broader Connections