Democratic politics should constitute democratic power, not eliminate it

Evidence

To assert the hegemonic nature of any kind of social order is to operate a displacement of the traditional relation between democracy and power. According to the deliberative approach, the more democratic a society is, the less power would be constitutive of social relations. But if we accept that relations of power are constitutive of the social, then the main question for democratic politics is not how to eliminate power but how to constitute forms of power more compatible with democratic values. — Chantal Mouffe, The Democratic Paradox, 451

Categorization

  • QUESTION: Core to the reader’s test: does reformulating democracy as constituting power (not eliminating it) still require an excluded enemy to constitute the ‘we’? This is the crux of Mouffe’s pluralism.
  • XREF: The ‘constitute rather than eliminate power’ move contrasts with the deliberative/consensus model of Habermas and connects to the adversarial frame the reader uses in their own work. — connects to: Democratic politics should mobilize passions, not eliminate them for rational consensus — Chantal Mouffe, The Democratic Paradox, 462; Deliberative politics is constitutive of democracy, not a regulative ideal — Jürgen Habermas, A New Structural Transformation of the…, 54; Believing power dissolves through rational debate endangers democratic institutions — Chantal Mouffe, The Democratic Paradox, 467 (+8 more)

Broader Connections