Power constitutes identities rather than acting between pre-formed ones.

Evidence

This implies that we should not conceptualize power as an extn7I4I relation taking place between two pre-constituted identities, but rather as constituting the identities themselves. This point of con8uence between objectivity and power is what we have called ‘hegemony’. — Chantal Mouffe, The Democratic Paradox, 97

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Defines the distinctive Mouffian sense of ‘hegemony’ as power-objectivity confluence.
  • XREF: connects to: Guaranteeing autonomous expression of diverse identities can unify rather than fragment a movement. — Michelle I. Gawerc, Coalition-building and the forging of…, 234; Schmitt treats unity and identity as given, not politically constructed. — Chantal Mouffe, The Democratic Paradox, 246; Power is constitutive of social relations, not separable from them. — Chantal Mouffe, The Democratic Paradox, 446 (+9 more)

Broader Connections