Counter-terrorism policy and imposed loyalty requirements shaped Muslim political engagement

Evidence

Allen identifies two key crucial socio-political factors that have shaped how Muslim communities are perceived and, in turn, determined how they are able to engage in public and political spaces. … The first is counter-terrorism policy, framing the Government’s thinking about Islam and Muslims, and the second is the requirement for groups to unequivocally accept and support certain government assumptions. As a result Muslim groups ‘were faced with having to be complicit and agreeable or be excluded from the discussion’. — Runnymede Trust (ed. Farah Elahi & Omar Khan), Islamophobia, 138

Categorization

  • XREF: The coercion/exclusion dynamic for Muslim civic groups mirrors the ‘obliged vs obliged’ distinction from my earlier work, and connects to Halliday’s concern about how ‘anti-Muslimism’ gets operationalized through state policy. — connects to: UK state intervention shaped and rivalized Muslim political representation. — A. Hussain, N. Meer, Framing Muslim Integration, 495; UK counter-terror funding redirected civic support away from Islamophobia work. — A. Hussain, N. Meer, Framing Muslim Integration, 496; Counter-terrorism policy forced Muslim groups into complicity or exclusion. — A. Hussain, N. Meer, Framing Muslim Integration, 145 (+11 more)

Broader Connections