Covert framing of Muslim surveillance as anti-terrorism suppressed public protest
Related
- Blanket accusations of Muslims justify state surveillance by identity (similarity 0.84)
- Framing counter-terrorism as safeguarding is openly contested. (similarity 0.83)
- The state suppresses Muslim dissent regardless of actual security threat level (similarity 0.82)
- American society explains rare Muslim terror through religion itself (similarity 0.79)
- Anti-Muslim surveillance drew no protest when framed as anti-terrorism (similarity 0.79)
- Media narratives mark Muslims as bodies that require surveilling (similarity 0.79)
- Surveillance mechanisms used on Muslims are also deployed against BLM activists (similarity 0.78)
- States repeatedly fail to suppress Muslim women’s self-determined resistance. (similarity 0.78)
- Civil-liberties-versus-security framing normalizes sacrificing minority rights. (similarity 0.78)
- Covert framing, not policy substance, determined public protests (similarity 0.78)