Communist successor parties repurposed legacies of past reform to gain democratic credibility.

Evidence

As a result, the communist successor parties were both handicapped and helped by their past; on the one hand, they were discredited as monopoly rulers, and faced a skeptical audience in any attempts to redeem themselves. This aspect of their past could confound coalition efforts and preclude wider acceptance by voters and other parties. On the other hand, the parties’ usable past as reformers, negotiators, and policy innovators could reinforce their claims of democratic commitment and competence, allowing the communist successors to redeem their past authoritarian efforts into democratic credibility. — Anna M. Grzymala-Busse, Redeeming The Communist Past, 74

Categorization

  • XREF: Directly relevant to the reader’s core question about post-1989 successor parties surviving by finding a new organizing narrative; the ‘usable past as reformers’ framing parallels how successor parties re-legitimate rather than decay. — connects to: Past organizational legacies can foster rather than only impede democratic adaptation. — Anna M. Grzymala-Busse, Redeeming The Communist Past: The…, 97; Discredited ancien regime actors can survive and succeed in new democratic orders. — Anna M. Grzymala-Busse, Redeeming The Communist Past: The…, 45; Communist parties lacking legitimacy bargained with society and reformed, preparing them for transition. — Anna M. Grzymala-Busse, Redeeming The Communist Past: The…, 331 (+7 more)
  • QUESTION: What specific non-communist threat or identity did these parties adopt once the external communist-versus-anticommunist axis dissolved? This passage shows the internal-source-of-credibility story but not the substitute-enemy story.

Broader Connections