Soviet-era contention supplied replicable models for later post-Soviet claim-making.
Evidence
Struggles for power within titular nationalities did not end with the Soviet collapse. In fact, the great tide of mobilization that swept over the Soviet Union after Mikhail Gorbachev’s arrival in power provided models for renewed claim-making through most of the post-Soviet space. — Charles Tilly, Regimes and Repertoires, 1257
Categorization
- XREF: Supports the repertoire-transmission idea central to Tilly’s framework — how contention models transfer across regime changes and borders. — connects to: Successor party resurgence combined post-1989 conditions, communist legacies, and crafted appeals — Anna M. Grzymala-Busse, Redeeming The Communist Past: The…, 1197; Communist successor parties repurposed legacies of past reform to gain democratic credibility. — Anna M. Grzymala-Busse, Redeeming The Communist Past: The…, 74; Nonrevolutionary claim-making forms later become available as revolutionary instruments when repertoires diffuse — Charles Tilly, Regimes and Repertoires, 984 (+1 more)
- corroborated: 2 independent passages support this claim — Charles Tilly, Regimes and Repertoires, 1257
Broader Connections
- Nonrevolutionary claim-making forms later become available as revolutionary instruments when repertoires diffuse
#expands(0.85) — Charles Tilly, Regimes and Repertoires, 984 - Communist successor parties repurposed legacies of past reform to gain democratic credibility.
#exemplifies(0.80) — Anna M. Grzymala-Busse, Redeeming The Communist Past, 74 - Demonstrations evolved into highly flexible claim-making by massing supporters at power sites
#expands(0.80) — Charles Tilly, Regimes and Repertoires, 1190 - Successor party resurgence combined post-1989 conditions, communist legacies, and crafted appeals
#exemplifies(0.78) — Anna M. Grzymala-Busse, Redeeming The Communist Past, 1197