Collective intellectual work requires respectful dialogic engagement to manage conflicting perspectives

Categorization

corroborated: 2 independent passages support this claim
XREF: connects to: Participants must be open to welcoming different and even conflicting ideas and perspectives — Dialogic space: An introduction; Dialogic approaches view human systems as riddled with tensionality requiring articulation of constituting tensions — Dialogic Perspectives - Communication; Collaborative thought is qualitatively different from individual writing and critical-dialogical engagement deepens understanding — Collective Writing: The Continuous Struggle for Meaning-Making (+21 more)

Participants must be open to welcoming different and even conflicting ideas and perspectives (similarity 0.87)
Dialogic interactions create open, critical, constructive spaces for negotiating differing ideas toward consensus (similarity 0.86)
Thinking is a sociable collective activity that transforms thinker and interlocutors (similarity 0.85)
Collaborative thought is qualitatively different from individual writing and critical-dialogical engagement deepens understanding (similarity 0.85)
Dialogic approaches view human systems as riddled with tensionality requiring articulation of constituting tensions (similarity 0.85)
True thinking requires an internal dialogue among conflicting viewpoints. (similarity 0.83)
Productive intellectual conflict requires explicit procedural manners of engagement. (similarity 0.83)

Social unity is felt through concrete relations rather than abstract awareness #expands (0.75) — Georg Simmel, on individuality and social forms_…, 169
Intellectual originality can be a product of marginal social position #complicates (0.72) — Georg Simmel, on individuality and social forms_…, 10