True thinking requires an internal dialogue among conflicting viewpoints.

Evidence

Thinking is an internal dialogue between two or more different views of the world. Viewpoint One is an avatar in a simulated world. It has its own representations of past, present and future, and its own ideas about how to act. So do Viewpoints Two, and Three, and Four. Thinking is the process by which these internal avatars imagine and articulate their worlds to one another. — Jordan B. Peterson, 12 Rules for Life An Antidote to Chaos, 727

Categorization

  • corroborated: 2 independent passages support this claim — Jordan B. Peterson, 12 Rules for Life An Antidote to Chaos, 727
  • XREF: connects to: Collective intellectual work requires respectful dialogic engagement to manage conflicting perspectives; Participants must be open to welcoming different and even conflicting ideas and perspectives — Dialogic space: An introduction; Dialogic interactions create open, critical, constructive spaces for negotiating differing ideas toward consensus — ‘Dialogic scaffolding’: Enhancing learning and understanding in collaborative contexts (+20 more)

Library Connections

Broader Connections