Philosophical inconsistency can generate richer intellectual movements than rigid logical consistency.

Evidence

There is in Descartes an unresolved dualism between what he learnt from contemporary science and the scholasticism that he had been taught at La Flèche. This led him into inconsistencies, but it also made him more rich in fruitful ideas than any completely logical philosopher could have been. — Bertrand Russell, History of Western Philosophy, 2085

Categorization

  • XREF: XREF connects to the productive tension between science and tradition in early modern philosophy. — connects to: The Stoic doctrine of virtue leads to logical contradictions with determinism — Bertrand Russell, History of Western Philosophy, 1033; Quine’s indeterminacy of translation and Kuhn’s incommensurability are logically distinct yet intellectually related, blurring the line between mere translation difficulty and true incommensurability. — Language Log: Incommensurability and indeterminacy; Philosophical refutations are seldom final and merely precede further refinements — Bertrand Russell, History of Western Philosophy, 295 (+16 more)
  • corroborated: 2 independent passages support this claim — Bertrand Russell, History of Western Philosophy, 2085

Broader Connections