Anti-racism requires defending all discriminated groups, not only one’s own

Evidence

It is not enough for people or organizations to challenge only the form of discrimination that directly affects them; antidiscrimination and equality are universal principles that must be defended even when doing so doesn’t have a direct effect on us personally. It is important to understand that different forms of racism have different attributes, whether anti-Jewish, anti-Muslim or anti-black, and that it is therefore reasonable and justifiable to understand and respond to specific forms of racism. But challenging racism requires challenging it in all its forms, and understanding antiracism as a wider human rights and equality position entails defending other groups that experience discrimination too. — Runnymede Trust (ed. Farah Elahi & Omar Khan), Islamophobia, 59

Categorization

  • XREF: This universalist anti-racism framing — recognizing distinct attributes of each specific racism while defending all — positions this report against a fragmented identity-politics approach; connects to the Runnymede framework’s insistence that anti-Muslim racism is one form within a broader racial-equality field. — connects to: Resisting one form of racism demands resisting all forms of racism. — A. Hussain, N. Meer, Framing Muslim Integration, 64; Anti-black racism within Muslim American communities remains unaddressed — Khaled A. Beydoun, American Islamophobia_ Understanding…, 436; Defending any language requires defending all linguistic multiplicity. — Édouard Glissant, Poetics of Relation, 503 (+1 more)

Broader Connections